Is South Korea a developed country???
Is South Korea a developed country???
is it first world?
bruh
Nope
No but neither is Pooland
kys gigacringe self hating gook
Why is Indonesia considered a third world country if it looks the same like South Korea and Japan?
Korea and Poland are second world.
sure looks the same to me
South Korea also has slums. Google 'slums South Korea'.
only a minority over there live in extreme poverty while in Indonesia it might as well be more than 30%
a developed country shouldn't have slums like that at all
South Korea and Japan are disappointing countries, they look way worse than their alleged wealth would indicate.
the only country creating affordable corona testing kits, testing everyone, not panic buying, has masks, and not in country wide quarantine lockdown, so yeah.
Is life in Malaysia or Singapore good?
yes industrialized country is developed country
cause they are two face up tight cunt who shit on SEA while sucking American cock
>Paris slums
>Homeless people in the US and UK
>Abos in Australia
Yeah, sure
And so is Japan
Yes OP I do love my counrty, but South Korea is not a developed country indeed.
Homeless people here are mostly schizos and drug addicts
so why does Korea look that bad?
no, your buttcrack can't dry unless you powder it
move here then
doesn't change the fact that they exist
they are first world because people don't die of starvation and treatable disease and almost everyone has tap water and electricity
Why? I like my country. (But I also like Indonesia)
Did a south korean fuck your bitch? I dont understand why an Indonesian would hate a korean since there is no historical contact
It was a very poor country until the 70s it's normal that some parts of it look like shit
I don't hate Korea, I like them. But I'm just wondering why it looks that bad despite having high GDP.
AaaaaaOP is Polish...ㅠㅠ
He's Polish and he hates Koreans because Poles hate all non-whites
Your geographical knowledge is unbelievable mutt
TEMEEEE!
>they are first world because people don't die of starvation and treatable disease and almost everyone has tap water and electricity
no, first world countries should also look like first world countries (like the Netherlands)
kek
>I'm just wondering why it looks that bad despite having high GDP.
Because east asians don’t exactly have a great sense of aesthetics.
For people like us: functionality >>>>> beauty. Imagine how strong this idea was back then when they were poor.
>Because east asians don’t exactly have a great sense of aesthetics.
Not exactly true, Singapore is beautiful and very well maintained.
South Korea yes, Poland no
i guessed the flag before i enter the thread
why??
>Not exactly true, Singapore is beautiful and very well maintained.
Hahaha. You have never been to Singapore then.
I've seen it on google street view. They don't have overhead powerlines for example.
>I've seen it on google street view
So not in real life. Okay.
how would it be different if I saw it in real life? do you mean that google is lying and removed overhead powerlines from their photos?
>how would it be different if I saw it in real life?
My guess is through google street view you only found the CBD neighborhoods. Go look up the residential areas where below middle class Singaporeans live. They are not so better than the pics you posted here, minus the lack of garbage.
>Go look up the residential areas where below middle class Singaporeans live.
tell me the name of the area, I will see
btw, Seoul (and Tokyo) have overhead powerlines even in the downtowns with office skyscrapers
Tip: Search around Ang Mo Kio. That town almost looks as if a slum in mainland China was shifted and relocated in Singapore.
i don't think so...
I checked like 20 random places in Ang Mo Kio and I swear I didn't find anything that looks bad. is actually one of the worst places I've found there, because other neighborhoods look like pic rel
not a single overhead powerline anywhere, no trace of bad maintenance, lack of order or anything
Yes, obviously. They just have third world level business ethics.
Dude you're right but why do you make 3 threads a week about it?
debatable.
I have lived in Singapore for 2 years. I think I’m the one who knows better about what Singapore actually looks like between you and me.
The more north you go in Singapore the shittier the areas look. You’re only viewing the two dimensional scenes through your computer which is one thing. And it’s another to see them in real life, feeling the environment with all of your senses.
Sure, overall they may look neat on the surface of your desktop. But if you have the opportunity to live there yourself long enough, you realize there’s something off with the whole city, something the city planners failed to take into account. A short answer to that is a lack of open space but it doesn’t end there. The atmosphere itself feels fake, static, and constrained. Every corner seems it is missing the touch of humanity.
There’s more about urban aesthetics than lack of overhead powerliens.
...
I've seen streets just like this in Tokyo (They were cleaner though, no cardboard boxes everywhere), every country, no matter how developed will have shitty areas.
Poorland
Imagine having income tax. Literal communism
>I have lived in Singapore for 2 years. I think I’m the one who knows better about what Singapore actually looks like between you and me.
I don't think so. First you tell me about some districts that are supposed to look bad, I give you photos and then you start explaining instead of giving me proofs. Show me a street on google street view that looks bad in your opinion and then we'll talk.
I don't understand what the difference between seeing a street on google street view and in reality is, if I don't want to rate the city's cuisine, climate or anything like that, just the level of maintenance and google street views are more than enough for that.
>The more north you go in Singapore the shittier the areas look.
Maybe it's true but what is 'shitty' by Singaporean standards is still much better than what is considered good in South Korea or Japan.
>The atmosphere itself feels fake, static, and constrained.
First world cities just feel fake, that's their inherent feature. It's the same with American suburbs for instance.
if you prefer 'living' and 'bustling' slums of Manila or favelas of Rio de Janeiro then it's your choice but let's not pretend these are 'first world'.
this chart doesnt prove anything, if youll take the US for example one of the richest countries in the world you would see that around %10 of the population lives in poverty
This. Every country, no matter how undeveloped, will have nice areas.
How can US have higher income tax than communist nation like China and Vietnam?
Are they closet commies all along
No, since those taxes are to pay for the freedom of the People of Israel, wich is their duty and legacy as defenders of freedom and democracy
south korea
KOREA IS A SHITHOLE PLEASE KEEP OUT OF THIS MISERABLE INFERNO
japan looks like this in a lot of places also