What do europeans think of the british broadcasting corporation?

>Too close to Bong government.
the current british government declared a war on bbc looks like they arent very close

it's the only channel i watch

Attached: bbconly.gif (360x640, 2.87M)

There is a huge confusion about the term "leftist" recently. I'd differentiate between "upper class leftism" (e.g. let the refugees in cuz I'd like to have a Syrian restaurant in my gentrified 5000€ rent-a-month hipster district) and "lower class leftism" (keep migrants out as we already struggle to give common people jobs, instead stop bombing Syria such that they can stay in their home countries). BBC is "upper class leftism" which is hated (rightfully so imo) by most common people.

How would you say the BBC is 'biased' towards those things then? Because they report on them? Remember they're impartial on political matters by law, maybe your mind is just warped?

one of the few proper sources of news left desu, even though i don't like their stance on a lot of things it would be bad to lose them

the government hasn't been on its side in 10 years

Even BBC is 100% pro-Nato and only pays lip service here and there to working class issues. In that sense they're totally in line with government politics. Ironically, the BBC is threatened by the same neoliberal politics it indirectly supports (silence is consent)

just use "liberalism" for "upper class leftism" and "leftism" for "lower class leftism"
"upper class leftism" is an oxymoron.

true, from a leftist point of view I could shit on them constantly but I know its an outlet that strives for "balance", even when it doesn't make much sense, like with vaccines, previously they were supposed to give anti-vaxxers a platform, and also recently I've heard a radio programme when they gave a terribly right wing biased person a full run, without any interruptions, without commenting it even(dont exactly remember the topic other than it had something to do with economy/business)

is that a 4ch trap

Yeah hit the nail on the head there, all well and good when you're reporting on an election but when you're talking about the climate or whatever it gives a platform to idiots. I suppose the point is to let the public decide for themselves which I suppose is admirable, you can't help if people are stupid can you

putting black people everywhere in historical settings in their shows shows a leftist political persuasion. having constant articles about what you shouldn't say to non-binary people shows a leftist political persuasion etc.

It's true though

Just because they shat on corbyn doesn't mean they aren't anti tory
Utterly braindead

Their culture section is filled with leftists bolocks and their political section is anti labour(rather anti corbyn) due to self preservation due to what corbyn wanted to do to it.

You are more deluded that a mutt orna frog if you think otherwise

You're left wing if you use black actors in historical settings? And reporting on trannies means you're left wing? I suppose Yas Forums is left wing then

lmao do tories actually believe this?

Schizo, even though theres evidence to show you're wrong you think you're right anyway

is letting in refugess "leftism"? according to whom? as for me it's just a basic humanitarianism, like helping countries with natural catastrophies I don't assign it to the right or the left at all, and if BBC was for accepting them to introduce more gentrification then it's not any leftism at all, in fact it would be a capitalistic neoliberal policy, so economically right-wing

Except "lower class leftist"is no different to fascism (other than the anti war sentiment)
>b-but I'm not a gsg autist

Explain how it's different

I love BBC but I hate the British broadcasting corporation?

>muh black actors in historical shakespeare plays
fuck off mutt

Then prove me wrong or fuck off back to r*ddit you pathetic cretins

How was the coverage of corbyn fair during the election
How is the attempt to force black people into any historical tv program or film not leftist crap

Attached: 1584365080421.jpg (453x604, 55.51K)

i don't want to get into some boring semantics debate about what "left wing" means, but the bbc is clearly very pro-immigration/multiculturalism. putting black people into historical setting where there were none or very few is clearly meant to reinforce the idea that britain (or other european countries) has always been multicultural and diverse and that mass immigration some how doesn't represent a threat to their identity. and it's not just reporting on trannies, it's supporting trannyism and lgbt generally.

Back to r*ddit tranny freaks

t. abdul mgwembe singh

historical shakespeare plays literally had femboy traps playing the female roles lmao

they used to be in the habit of having a professor with 15 years of research and publications quoted along side mark from vaccinescauseautismdotorg in a manner that presented both opinions as equally balanced and worthy of debate, of course it's not the beebs fault that there's often no credible counter source but still, they had a memo going around recently to stop doing this for obvious reasons

No they had male actors playing female roles because women can't act

>BBC

Attached: 2qcds2.jpg (614x586, 36.43K)

Why does int attract so many leftpol trannies?

Just fuck off to reddit if you aren't capable of basic cognition, not even a left vs right issue just utter braindamage

>I'm right because I say I am and NO I won't look up any reports on it you must spoon feed me

Imagining meeting one of you specimens in real life but very doubtful I'd find you in a public place

Leftist ideologies seek to abolish private property and replace it with worker owned or in some cases state owned companies. Fascism and liberalism don't. The word "privatisation" was literally coined to describe the economic policy of the nazi government.

what are you babbling about? how about you respond to my post

it's like a competition on who comes up with the most creative insult
do y'all constantly talk like this

Do people really argue which jewish controlled party they prefer lmao. If its allowed to exist, its kosher

why does int attract so many pol stormfaggots?

just fuck off to pol if you aren't capable of basic cognition, not even a left vs right issue just utter brain damage

Their news reports are okay and their nature documentaries are good.
Haven't watched any of their shows.

>Reply seriously to my autistic conspiracy theories

Great nature documentaries. Has there been any good ones since Planet Earth II?

Seven worlds one planet came out late last year and it was good, they did an episode per continent. There was an insane scene with walruses l, never seen anything like it, don't want to spoil it but you should look it up

don't really believe you're actually this obtuse as to deny something so blatantly political is merely a coincidence. but lets say that you're right and they are just hiring black actors because they are the best people for the job (lol). what about putting black people in drawings of medieval britain in their educational material? how can you think that doesn't have an agenda behind it?

>as to deny
as to assert*

>BBC has a neoliberal right wing agenda
imagine my shock

Attached: 1548255106271.jpg (550x595, 130.16K)

I invite you to find a single article on the BBC detailing our involvement in the half dozen conflicts where we actively support people in committing war crimes

You're looking at it the wrong way. The point is to be inclusive. Imagine if you were a brown kid growing up and you never saw anyone who looked like you in any media. Would you feel part of the country or not? It's a way of bringing the country together. You must be actually autistic if you think it's some conspiracy to make people think there were black people in England 2000 years ago

i'm not going to get into right-wing/left-wing definitions because it's a pointless exercise. it's pro-immigration/multiculturalism/so called "anti-racism". simple as.

yeah obviously. It's a right wing neoliberal news source. Is this your first day in the real world? Why are you pretending like this is some sort of revelation?

don't buy that for a second because they do it for other countries too. and i have to go now, so i won't be responding anymore.

Lol

his mummy let him on Yas Forums and now he understands the world as it is

While that is true did fascists also not use worker coops?
Holy fuck this is peak r*ddit
None is debating on a fucking source

FUCK OFF YOU SLIMIE CRETIN
What the fuck is right wing about wanting more immigrants when the only pro immigration party is left wing fuck off you brainlet
Okay it's confirmed some bellend from r/unitedkingdom lmao fuck off you pathetic tranny

Yes

BBC is fucking great, my wife really enjoys it.
Take that as you may, like my wife does.

Please fuck off back to r*ddit

The UK is a one party state now so what's the point in fighting labour will never be in power again any potential leader they can put forward is either retarded, or a metropolitan elite remainer

>What the fuck is right wing about wanting more immigrants
neoliberalism and globalism

>What the fuck is right wing about wanting more immigrants
To make sure that the supply of labor is always greater than the demand for labor which decreases the bargaining power for workers and unions which keeps wages down so owners can keep more of the profit
As right wing as it gets.

It's the mouthpiece of the British bourgeoisie.

They make good documentaries
Would take BBC news with a grain of salt though

Neolibralism yes
But leftists don't support mass immigration?
Corbyn isn't a leftist? Wew lad big brain on this one is he a neo liberal plant? A jewish spy?