Yeah fucking working class wanting to live

Attached: yes.jpg (647x659, 40.42K)

Excuse me, I didn't know I was in the prescence of a gamer. By all means please take as much money as necessary sir.

Because I will kill you and take your excess

Yes, my life has some sort of value because I'm capable of having banal conversations and orgasming even though I contribute nothing to the systems which sustain me.

>The sooner we can automate their jobs the better.
I mean that is pretty much inevitable in our lifetime. But just because they can't do menial jobs anymore doesn't mean they're a waste of life.

DUDE JUST LET THOSE DIABETIC PEOPLE DIE LMAO THAT'S WHAT JESUS CHRIST WOULD DO AFTER SHOOTING HIS AR-15 AT MEXICANS CROSSING THE BORDER

Anyone who requires insulin, is a diabetic who has led a life decades of eating unhealthily, probably obese and ugly.

Such filth should not be prevented from dying.

>excess
Huh? Who are you to say how much money others can have?

Only if you're female.

Why can't they afford health insurance? And who can't? Most of america can, don't act like the entirety of america is living within poverty, dying. They are not a developing country, poor in america is rich in the developing world.

>Who are you to say how much money others can have?
Who the fuck are YOU to demand the right to use roads or the electricity grid? You didn't fucking build them, you don't fucking maintain them. Pull yourself up by your Blundstones and provide for yourself instead of being a fucking leech upon society. You self entitled parasite.

Retarded leftist.

lolol Like I said what should we do about the poor? Hopefully they will just disapear.

>I thought America was the greatest country in the world

Get with the times grandpa.

No one who does that kind of work is using their life on a way that can justify it's existence.

>Like I said
No cunt, like I said: who the fuck are YOU to demand the right to use roads or the electricity grid? You didn't fucking build them, you don't fucking maintain them. Pull yourself up by your Blundstones and provide for yourself instead of being a fucking leech upon society. You self entitled parasite.
Don't fucking like it? That's your fucking worldview, you absolute hypocritical parasite.

based

They can't afford it because they're poor, so they should die, because they're poor.

>2020
>not wanting insurance oligopolies to be in charge of whether you live or die
Are you some kind of commie?

This isn't a place for an underager.

Caring about human life and not wanting other people to suffer? Challenging wealth inequality? Fucking leftist

I payed taxes
So others should pay for it? Because they are poor? Maybe they should form a relationship with their family. Oh wait not even they want to pay for their shit.

Believing their is an inherent value to human life is pure cringe.

>muh wealth inequality
>i guess we better tax everyone to death so we can equally have nothing

This. If you don't want to be just a statistic in a Wall Street financial company's financial plan, it must be because you're jealous of success.

What is about you that justifies being more than anything else?

Deny that people have inherent rights that come from God is pure cringe my friend
No, just tax the top wealth-earners and punish them when they hoard

ITT retarded bootlickers hating "the poor" while making $3000
You're on the same boat as anybody else
You will never be rich

>billionieres exploiting their workers, trashing environment and overall providing poor working conditions so they can get the most of the money
>lol ur just jealous
Nice corporate dick sucking

And what happens after you tax them and they either leave or stop earning as much? If they know they will be taxed to death after X amount why would they continue to work? You can tax what people earn, you can't tax what they decide is no longer worth it.

And most elite are holding stocks not piles of money.

Yes. I don't see what's so absurd about this.
We're not even talking about welfare checks, we're talking about affordable life-saving drugs. What the fuck lmao

>And what happens after you tax them and they either leave or stop earning as much?
Yeah except that's a neoliberal myth and never actually happens
>If they know they will be taxed to death after X amount why would they continue to work?
They generaly don't "work" in the first place

How is it fair? Its nice for the person who needs the drugs but not for the other person paying. Everyone is always so sure it'll be someone else paying for it. I admit it is extremely liberterian to say but everyone understands what happens if you don't get health insurance there are all sorts of programs in Australia. If you can't afford it, and your family doesn't care, I ask why should I?

if it's not fair for other people to pay for your shit then what's the point of insurance at all and not having everybody just use a HSA to pay for all of their healthcare?

Why must people work? Is investing not a job? If its so easy why don't you go up to wall street and get a job and make millions. These are experts who lose money regularly. Who decides what is a valid career? Because someone is not breaking their back they didn't work for it?

Insurance is hardly the same as being forced to pay at gun point for someone elses rubbbish.

I have no fondness for the rich. I just don't believe the poor are justified in their delusions of self-worth.

Attached: MUH INSULIN.png (602x2294, 409.32K)

americans are soulless creatures

>Why must people work?
Most people unironically don't have to, majority of jobs in developed economies are totally superfluous.
>If its so easy why don't you go up to wall street and get a job and make millions
Because it's out of reach of the average person, people with the means to make a lot of money on the stock market aren't your average person.
>Who decides what is a valid career?
I'm not making the argument that it isn't a valid career, but when capital is distributed more widely it's better for people as a whole and it results in a healthier economy.

>hen capital is distributed more widely it's better for people as a whole and it results in a healthier economy.
So what should doctors too earn less to distribute capital more? If people can make money gambling on the stock market who is to say they earn too much? And why is it out of reach? Because even experts lose millions of dollars it's hard.

It's better for who? Certainly not the people being taxed more.

Based moralist

>Because it's out of reach of the average person
This, you need money to make money. Even people single folks have have a hard time saving and having to scrap by just to put pennies into a fund to invest in anything. It takes capital to make capital.

These people's labor could be entirely replaced machines without the use of artificial intelligence. I doubt they could even justify their existence if pressed. The term "folks" sounds really contrived. If you personally know someone with any sort of education beyond the undergrad level, you aren't a "folk."

>exercise and eating right
yeah really helpful tip for us t1 diabetics, thanks bruh :^)

>How is it fair?
You ask this before saying people should die because you don't want to pay taxes.

Based neolibrainlet

Why should my taxes go up to support wast-life. I have no problem paying for things that serve a purpose, but to use the social system to prop up individuals detrimental to that system, is not something I want to foot the bill for.

What do you contribute to society that a type 1 diabetic can't?

>So what should doctors too earn less to distribute capital more?
Doctors make pennies compared to oil execs or holding company CEOs
>If people can make money gambling on the stock market who is to say they earn too much?
The state enacts a progressive tax to benefit the population as a whole
, wealthier people pay a larger proportion of their wealth because they can afford to and it benefits the country as a whole
>And why is it out of reach?
The average person doesn't have or make enough money to make gambling in stocks worthwhile.
>Because even experts lose millions of dollars it's hard.
Generally investors win more than they lose, and they can afford to lose millions (if they can't then they're idiots)
>It's better for who?
People who have access to, for example, public services like health care, public transport and other infrastructure, education, high culture, welfare, old age pensions, etc.
>Certainly not the people being taxed more.
They can afford to pay a larger portion of their income while still being the richest people in the country, most of the population is better off with public services

The ability to perform my labor in a the event of a shortage of insulin.

Do you support anarchoprimitivism?

>These people's labor could be entirely replaced machines without the use of artificial intelligence.
Not necessarily what I am talking about, working and blue collar is not purely fast food and service industry. More along the lines of rising prices of products and services, and the stagnation of income increases, despite products slowly rising each and every year, while companies streamline their production and efficiency, while also cutting workforce, which is to be expected, but don't pass those savings onto the customer.

Attached: SPOILER_ESKVJi7XYAMg32H.png (851x1038, 1.3M)

>A second study from the National Center for Health Statistics at the CDC showed that 39.6% of US adults age 20 and older were obese as of 2015-2016 (37.9% for men and 41.1% for women)
If one in three people can't take care of their health should others pay for them?

On a side note, how did you feel about Yang and his UBI idea, with scrapping social security retirement and income, and replacing it with UBI?