Thoughts?

>Absolute state of UK

Attached: Capture.png (714x116, 8.29K)

although chinks and gooks have managed to stabilise their hot spots. given that, that estimate seems a bit too exaggerated

>mutation
>designed
are you retarded? It's literally random. If it mutates to 100% death rate, the virus won't care because it's a fucking unthinking bunch of molecules.

Thank god virus never mutate to greater lethality. EXCEPT LIKE THE SPANISH FLU DID. You arsehole dumbfuck.

Spread it in the refugee camps and limit treatment to them.

This virus is really good at targeting health ministers but really bad at targeting heads of state.

Who do you think's gonna be the first one? My money's on Iran's Imam.

>The virus only affects old people, most Africans are young.
Not true it affects plenty of people in Africa.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8098831/Coronavirus-doctor-reveals-patients-intensive-care-young-40.html

It's March already and I can't wait for the next heatwave to hit Europe

>doesn't even know how mutation works
im not arguing with someone who lives in a horse and cart

I didn't say they dont mutate, read again you stroppy fuck

Trump will get corona

I bet on whoever rules Italy.

We had like 3 days of snow all winter so it's going to be glorious.

Yeah, probably this. Trump and Pence were both at CPAC which is where Ted Cruz and a bunch of other republican politicians got corona.

Trump's a really lucky guy though, so I bet he's immune to it, or he'll get it and make a full recovery in 6 days to legitimize himself.

Normally I'd agree but he unironically said he doesn't need to be tested or treated because he's probably immune and doesn't have it anyways so I don't know

Nigger this is already deadlier than the Spanish flu if you're not treated with antivirals, oxygen, ventilators, extracorporeal life support units or antibiotics for secondary bacterial infections.

Ebola death toll in Africa at its peak (2013-2016): 11.000, in a population of 1.2 billion.
Coronavirus death toll in China alone in 2020 and still going up: 4.000, in a population of 1.3 billion.

If Africans can withstand Ebola better than you can withstand a flu I've got some really bad news for you.

ebola isn't airborne.

youtu.be/xWvNtaABRrs

This has to be bait

Bad statistical analysis. Neither epidemic was in all of China or Africa, you should look at the population of actually contaminated zones. Not to mention that ebola doesn't trasmit as easily.

Bait.

90% of Africans live in primitive conditions and they have the highest birthrates in the world as well as the lowest life expectancy. What could completely decimate first world economies and kill millions is just another day in Africa. They live in the apocalypse 24/7 and know how to thrive in it, you don't.

It finally reached my state. It's over bros. Italy, I'm sorry for bullying you about it

Attached: Bang.jpg (640x480, 39.84K)

ebola isn't airborne.

>"AHHHHHHHHHH THIS IS REVENGE FOR CORONAAAAA"
>*assault random Asians they see on the street*
I'm afraid to go to Europe from now on.

Focus shifted from Asians onto Italian 2 weeks ago

At least it solve's Europe's demographic crisis.

Just please add more Mudslim Syrian refugees from Pakistan.

Based, but why only 60%? Wouldn´t it just jump to 90+%? I fail to see how could the 40% stay contained.

It's not bait, it's true. Spanish flu had a mortality rate of around 3%. This has around 1-2% with using all the treatments I mentioned in my post.

It seems like it's started doubling and tripling here now. A couple days ago there were 20 cases but now it's 60. Still very low compared to other countries but I guess it will go into the hundreds soon

Attached: prööh.jpg (1108x1476, 229.3K)

Good, i've been actively doing my suicide by cirrhosis these past six years, that should speed up my death.

the ebolavirus is spreading completely differently to the coronavirus, ebola is mostly spread per blood, direct body contact or other secrets. corona is way more aggressive in spreading from human to human compare to ebola.

It's ok I fear my own aquaintances/family members more, because they have a tendency to wanna hug or shake hands upon meeting.

It's nothing in Africa. 90% of them live in borderline savage conditions or literal savage conditions, they don't rely on highly sensitive structures to survive like developed countries do.

My government sanctioned thoughts is that despite the disease running rampant across the world everything will be different here because of our state of the art healthcare

>This has around 1-2% with using all the treatments I mentioned in my post.
80% of cases are already confirmed to be mild. Meanwhile stats you see in the 3-5% mortality range are mostly attributable to under-reported cases. Ever since South Korea started taking full account of its total cases, for example, they saw actual mortality rates plunge to around 0.5%.

When you see disproportionate death rates like in Iran, Italy and the United States, it's more likely they had cases go undetected for weeks now and are still behind on test kits/methodology to know exactly how many people have the virus.

Take it from us, we were the first country to report cases outside China and so far only one person has died (and he was suffering from dengue on top of the COVID-19 coronavirus).

Attached: 1575690331301.png (1040x1250, 344.31K)

LMAOOOOO

>Ever since South Korea started taking full account of its total cases, for example, they saw actual mortality rates plunge to around 0.5%.
You are dumb mate.

There are 7500 cases in South Korea and 60 of them are dead, which means they have a case fatality rate of ~0.8%, but the problem is you can't calculate a fatality rate based on the total number of cases when almost all of those cases still haven't recovered.

Out of the 7500 cases in South Korea, only 250 individuals have recovered and ~7200 are still infected.

We don't know how many of the 7200 infected will recover and how many will die. This estimate of 0.8% is assuming that all of the 7200 people will recover and that the mortality rate will stay constant.

It's ridiculous to do the math with the assumption that every one of them will recover and then marvel at how much lower their fatality rate rate is.

Finally death rate will rise many times higher

>no community spread here yet somehow
>infected idiots can't stop coming here by the dozens from other countries
fucking hell just close all airports

Attached: 1583479678642.png (358x242, 104.37K)

ebola killed people so quick they couldnt pass it on

It's also ridiculous to say shit like everyone will die without intensive care when 80% of cases are mild and the majority of serious cases are still manageable through standard supportive care.

Attached: corona.png (684x1188, 219.75K)

Ebola is spread by fecal matter, corvid19 is spread by liquid from sneezing, spit, feves, etc. Also, africa gets fucked the hardest by the flu.

worldlifeexpectancy.com/cause-of-death/influenza-pneumonia/by-country/

>everyone will die without intensive care
I never said this, I said that the mortality rate will be higher than 0.8% since there are currently 7200 people in Korea who haven't recovered yet and we don't know how many of them will die or not. I never said all 7200 of them will die without intensive care.

No

>Angela Merkel warns up to 58 million Germans - 60-70% of the population - will be infected
isn't she right about this? there is no immune substance for corona so far, the best thing you can do right now is slowing down the outbreak as much as possible. so that less and less people got infected. so what is the problem with this statement?

Europeans do too much face to face touching when greeting each other.

>Okay coming back to this post, calling you an idiot went too far.
Apology accepted.

>You probably read that Korea had a fatality rate of 0 5% on some article
And I guarantee you read that everyone would die without being hooked up to artificial lungs from a conspiracy blog written by a deranged milkman living on the outskirts of Kurikka.

You could wipe out billions of Africans and it would barely make a dent on their way of life. They don't rely on highly sensitive structures like very complex industries, global markets, politics and other civilized stuff in order to thrive. They have Ebola, AIDS, malaria, dengue, cholera, and they barely give a shit. You're delusional if you think that's going to have any effect there, or going to cause even 1/1000th the amount of damage it's already causing outside of Africa.

It's factually correct but all world leaders so far have made sure to never say it

sensationalist trash

>And I guarantee you read that everyone would die without being hooked up to artificial lungs
Where exactly did I even imply this? You said that the mortality rate in Korea is 0.5%, and I corrected you because there's no indication of this being true.

businessinsider.com/coronavirus-death-rate-by-country-2020-3

>Coronavirus: South Korea’s infection rate falls without citywide lockdowns like China, Italy

scmp.com/week-asia/health-environment/article/3074469/coronavirus-south-korea-cuts-infection-rate-without

Italy started the quarantine when they had 5800 infections. Adjusting for population, the equivalent number for Sweden is 967 cases. You are now at 455. If the numbers keep growing at 26% per day, you'll be at 967 on the 16th

I don't really want to take my chances with a disease where one in five suffers serious illness and 6,1 percent are critical

Attached: 41c6f4c1.jpg (1209x510, 123.09K)

>The virus only affects old people
The original clades yes, not two of the 3 we've here now.

I want to apologize to all SEA and East Asian countries (minus Japan?? idk). You tried and succeeded to contain it. Worked hard with testing, and social distancing, mask wearing and quarantines.

For us Westoids it seems too much effort to do anything other than the bare minimum. So fukkit we will just let another new illness roll over us and spread it everywhere we go from now on. Nothing personnel.

imagine all the germans qts we are going to lose :(

What "original clades"?

>no indication of this being true
You're right, it's about 0.6%. My bad.

Attached: 5e62892ffee23d347c732e45.jpg (800x727, 62.93K)

what a chad

That's not the mortality rate, that's just the percentage of people who have confirmed to been infected and have died. But as I pointed out in this post
this way of calculating is false, because there's a huge time delay between being infected and dying.

What does infection rate have to do with mortality rate?