Are you a civic nationalist?

Attached: main-qimg-0b3d1d2ce2f002890cef91365eb9ac84.jpg (850x400, 97.5K)

Other urls found in this thread:

jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/ryssen1.htm
leparisien.fr/seine-saint-denis-93/seine-saint-denis-combien-etes-vous-vraiment-19-02-2019-8015784.php
democratieparticipative.me/letat-promet-une-prime-de-10000-aux-fonctionnaires-blancs-qui-parviendront-a-survivre-5-ans-dans-le-93/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

he's right about the pure races thing at least

nah ethnonationalist

Kek, no, I'm not an irrational cringelord. I'm an anarcho-capitalist.

>shitolini says this
>literally introduces racial laws in Italy

remove "not"

mussolini loved to suck hitler's cock

no i'm a semi-civic nationalist

He only did that because he had to bend over for Hitler. Mussolini was shit.

>I’m not a cringe lord
>ancap
Is this bait?

he was a cuck like most of his countrymen

>I'm an anarcho-capitalist.
The owner of this thread did not give you permission to post in it without paying a fee.
On behalf of a a specially hired private police, I am forced to beat all the shit out of you.

no
national pride is autistic because you claim the acconplishments of others
immigrants should obviously learn the country's language and agree with the basic values of the host society (human rights, basic manners etc), but it doesn't really need more than that

The fact that there aren't 100% pure races isn't a good argument against ethnonationalism

that
Else would be gay

Hitler required it for every member of the Axis

I’m not a nationalist. Rather a social-racist. The paradigm has changed, and I can’t be «nationalistic» when million of creaturas have the same citizenship as me. This is just meaningless and outdated.

Thats just ethnonationalism

>national pride is autistic because you claim the acconplishments of others
The reason for ethnonationalism is that ethnic cohesion exists and you need to take that into account

Even our European nations are outdated. Further cooperation or union would be needed. The EU would be a good idea if it wasn’t actively replacing European people with foreign hordes.

>The EU would be a good idea if it wasn’t actively replacing European people with foreign hordes.
it isn't. Immigration isn't replacement. Also the EU isn't in charge of immigration, the national governments are, brainlets like you just need the EU as scapegoat.

I hate my country.

Mussolini’s ideas on race changed a lot throughout his life. This quote is overused.

No I’m perfectly aware of the toxicity of our national governments. But the EU condoned the spreading of invaders in numerous countries (through quotas) even if some refused at first or are still reluctant, as well as their sole entry since they didn’t enforce a policy comparable to what we’re seeing now in Greece (although sinking the fucking boats would send a better message).

Don’t think you can brain me, kike.

>Mussolini’s ideas on race changed a lot throughout his life. This quote is overused.
he had no ideas, he just did what he tought was best for him, like a real Chad

immigrants aren't invaders, even if seeing a black person makes you cry you little faggot
and I'm not a Jew, I'm German

im not a nationalist at all.
i want to live where i can have the best health, material well being and enjoyment

i want to make people who i can laugh with or have interest discussions with my compatriots

Yes they are invaders even if seeing that word makes you cry, faggot.

>even if seeing a black person makes you cry you little faggot
It causes a lot of problems in the receiving countries, kike

nationalism is cringe.

The sole fact that the rhetoric shifted from «refugees» to «immigrants» as if the entire world was not legitimate to come here demonstrates that it is an invasion and not some pseudo-humanitarian policy (that would still be stupid).

I'm not the one seething at others because they don't look like me

>was not
I wish.
Was now*, I meant

I can see why he would say that

Brown hands

>national pride is autistic because you claim the acconplishments of others
It goes both ways

dumb hands.

if your country is a worse place to live than another why should you be nationalistic?

>Immigration isn't replacement.
>tf
Haha

The country should be run with nationalism to avoid certain problems

If it was only that, it would still be a disturbance, but it would me more livable. There’s also the smell, the insalubrity, the endemic drug trafficking and crime, robberies, rapes, daily stabbings or occasional worse terror attacks, and so on.

Even if shitskins weren’t low IQ apes prone to this kind of behavior, the people would still unconsciously feel more comfortable and confident when they live among their own than when they are forced to live alongside foreign elements. This is basically the ingroup advantage, or cross-race effect. It's not always verbalized because people see racism or, said differently, the wish to live in White homogeneous territories as the ultimate sin, but it is surely expressed directly or indirectly by an overwhelming amount of the population. Even, and perhaps especially, among all those anti-racist who carefully maintain themselves and their kids away from the invaded areas.

haha da joos xD

Why should white people surrender their demographic and political power to invaders who rape and kill them?

You are not white.

Because value of a nation is not about material goods you cosmopolitan gypsy

on an individual level what is the benefit of nationalism?
seems like a meaningless attachment running contrary to ones own interests

ik xDD

Well, Jews are certainly an hostile group that have been legitimately chased away and denounced for centuries if not more.

Here’s a good synthetic book on the matter for the laymen:
jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/ryssen1.htm

what is it about?
i dont even mean material well being only though

To be fair he lived at a time where europe was 99% european.
He's also somewhat right about the "pure races"

Tired NPC nonsense

Having a home and not a hotel

The benefit isn't on an individual level, it's a political ideology not just your feelings about the country. People already see themselves as part of different groups and that can cause problems or help strengthen a sense of community.

How is it contrary to ones own interests? The more brown and black people a country has the more less influence white people have on the governments of their own countries, countries that were for the most part founded around their ethnicity.

what if you want to move home?
what if your house doesnt feel like home?

No. Making niggers feel proud of the country they live in would be like wrapping a flag around a dog.

Your country has bad and good moments, but strong and coherent communities will face them and deal with them. Uprooted «world citizens» (citizens of nowhere) will just be opportunistic parasites.
There’s nothing more valuable than blood and soil.

>living together in peace regardless of ethnicity isn't more valuable than muh blood and muh soil
have sex

See the following:
I live in peace when I’m in my native village.
I’m not in peace when I’m in a cosmopolitan hellhole filled with crazy niggers and sandniggers everywhere.

you seething over seeing brown people doesn't mean there's no peace

You are such a brainlet.

>The benefit isn't on an individual level,
not worth my time then.
lots of value judgments
no actual arguments

Based
Po*roid cope, no one gives a fuck about your peasant "culture"

All the things I’ve mentioned in the first paragraph means there’s not tranquility nor civility anymore. We import third-world apes and with them come their endemic problems. It goes further than«radical Islamic terrorism» or whatever. Daily crime is much more harmful.
And as soon as districts get replaced at 80, 85, 90, 95% even, it literally becomes the third-world.

For example, the Seine-Saint-Denis in France is notorious for being one of the most invaded departments of the country. The authorities don’t even know how many people officially live there and offer bonuses for the civil servants willing to work there.

leparisien.fr/seine-saint-denis-93/seine-saint-denis-combien-etes-vous-vraiment-19-02-2019-8015784.php
democratieparticipative.me/letat-promet-une-prime-de-10000-aux-fonctionnaires-blancs-qui-parviendront-a-survivre-5-ans-dans-le-93/

Of course this isn’t only a matter of security, it is also a financial burden with all the gibs and healthcare they receive plus the countless frauds (fake divorces, psychiatric troubles...).

>ninety-five percent at least
The man was decades ahead of his time, it wasn't until long after his death that we started supporting our arguments with bullshit statistics.

mental that Hitler allied with this guy
especially since Hitler didn't like meds.

How have you provided a single convincing argument so far? Also see my other posts.

What's the value of nation then?

>american education

Americans unironically believe in the «Hitler wanted to kill anyone who wasn’t blonde and blue-eyed» for the most part. This is the problem with history, easily accessible in appearance, but many illiterate morons whose opinions don’t go further than the fragments they’ve gathered from school, while thinking they’re educated and knowledgeable.

Musso wasn't a civnat, this comment is in a european (LL European races are equal) context opposed to Hitler's germanic supremacy, it's not like he thought libyans or ethiopians were equal to italians

>Hitler wanted to kill anyone who wasn’t blonde and blue-eyed
never said that

Didn’t say you did. You still said something stupid.