Why isn't circumcision a human rights violation by the UN? And yes I know about Jews but if your religion requires my dick to be cut it's not a religion it's a goddanm cult.
Why isn't circumcision a human rights violation by the UN...
Other urls found in this thread:
apps.who.int
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
mensstudies.com
jme.bmj.com
4eric.org
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
circumcision.org
cirp.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
cirp.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
twitter.com
It's because of the jews.
Jews and muslims.
They can shove a knife up their asshole I want my foreskin back
it's not fair
WHO notes the benefits of circumcision outweigh the drawbacks:
apps.who.int
Only people who deny it are intactivists and MRAs (same difference)
Kill yourself I still should've had a choice and like says it makes me not trust my parents
americans be like
>why use condoms and wash your dick when all you can do is pay 5000 dollars to have someone tear off an integral part of it
fucking braindead bootlicker
Circumcision decreases penile sensitivity
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Circumcision associated with sexual difficulties
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Circumcision linked to alexithymia
mensstudies.com
The exaggeration of the benefits of circumcision in regards to HIV/AIDS transmission
jme.bmj.com
Circumcision/HIV claims are based on insufficient evidence
4eric.org
There is no case for the widespread implementation of circumcision as a preventative measure to stop transmission of AIDS/HIV
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Circumcision decreases sexual pleasure
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Circumcision decreases efficiency of nerve response in the glans of the penis
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Circumcision policy is influenced by psychosocial factors rather than alleged health benefits
circumcision.org
Circumcision linked to pain, trauma, and psychosexual sequelae
cirp.org
Circumcision results in significant loss of erogenous tissue
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Circumcision has negligible benefit
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Neonatal circumcision linked to pain and trauma
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Circumcision may lead to need for increased care and medical attention in the first 3 years of life
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Circumcision linked to psychological trauma
cirp.org
Circumcision may lead to abnormal brain development and subsequent deviations in behavior
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
>MUH MENZ RIGHTS, MUH PENISFEELS
While you are at it why not give me some antivaxx links?
OP asked about the UN. Here is the official WHO report which carefully analyzes the entire body of work on circumcision, weighs the pros and cons and understands that saving human lives is more important than "muh penisfeels":
apps.who.int
Pros
>Reduces chance of HIV infection. Irrelevant if you live in a country with low rates of HIV infections and has easy access to condoms.
Cons
>All this shit
Yeah, I think I'll keep my dick in one piece, thank you.
but i not be like that
i not be like that at all
It's a shit post,don't take it personally.
Have you tried stretching?
>Reduces chance of HIV infection.
Is what I heard bullshit anyway
I wish I had a choice
i know.
and yeah i've been tugging and retaining, started a few months ago and admittedly haven't been consistent but i have seen some growth, or at least the skin stretches further now.
I've tried for a month so far but I froget to do it and I see no growth. Why did my parents do this to me? I want people like to me murderd
Do you moisturize ? And what do you stretch with?manual,weighted,dtr?
I will never understand how someone's life becomes so pointless they decide a crusade against the removal of a useless flap of skin on other people's penises is worthy of their time. This is a sub-shitposting-on-Yas Forums level issue in terms of importance. Circumcision could be totally eradicated or totally enforced tomorrow (for newborns) and your life wouldn't change at all.
>Do you moisturize
no, that actually never occurred to me. i've mainly been stretching manually. I got a DTR about a year ago but didn't have enough skin to get it on reliably and gave up.
then I recently tried O-rings, which managed to keep my skin stretched over the glans completely, and after doing that I had enough skin to get the DTR on easily. I can't tell if I've actually grown new skin yet but the skin seems to wrinkle more and definitely stretches further than it used to. retaining with the ring seemed to help immensely.
It's unironically because of addiction to porn, that's why it's been discussed so much on Yas Forums
they think masturbation would feel so much better with the foreskin intact
Fuck you it's part of my body and even if I was asexual it would be wrong it's MY BODY and I should Have a right to take it off if I want to not my parents
((()))
((()))
((()))
>t.Shit post
It's not all about who cooms harder,it's about being violated hours from birth without consent.Not to mention it looks and feels terrible
If I had a pinkie sliced off id be pissed
I actually made a weighted stretcher and it feels and looks like it's working well.
Yeah,you don't want stretch marks so lotion would help.
>Jew is pro circumcision
What a shocker! Fuck you and your cult! I hope you get geocoded again!
>friend is having a baby soon
>he's probably going to circumcise it
>want to talk him out of it, but don't want to be "that guy" who tells friends how to raise their children
Just spam him with shit about circumcision,worked with my friend
>WOWIE ZOWIE, IF I CUT MY FORESKIN OFF I’M ONLY 1% LESS LIKELY TO GET A STD
Kill yourself.
I don't like the idea of my genitals being mutilated without my consent thank you very much
well, am i wrong?
i'm not pro circumcision you retard, learn how to read
the jews stole my tonsils
>The prevalence is highest in southern Africa, where over 15% of adults are living with HIV. Notably, each country in this region with high prevalence of HIV (Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Zambia, Zimbabwe) has a relatively low circumcision prevalence (53), whereas over 80% of males are circumcised in the two southern African countries with low HIV prevalence (Angola 3.7%; Madagascar 0.5%). In Mozambique, the overall prevalence of self-reported male circumcision is 60% (13), but this varies by province.
It's entire basis for "cutfags have less HIV" is based on the data comparison between few different countries with different ethnicities, culture and prevalence of circumcision instead of comparing data between cut and uncut men from the same social, cultural and financial background.
>HIV prevalence is consistently lower in provinces where male circumcision is common (Cabo Delgado, Inhambane, Nampula, Niassa), and higher where few men are circumcised (Gaza, Manica, Maputo, Sofala, Tete, Zambezia).
The only country where they apparently have some concrete data but they hide the numbers despite being eager to show them everywhere else where they look like working in their favour.
A vague statement of "consistently lower" but nowhere by how much. A HIV prevalence of less than 2% in areas with more circumcision is a bullshit argument.
Get the fuck out of here. this study is non objective piece of garbage written by someone with an agenda. Not only a kike but probably a racist bastard too since it seems way to comfortable lumping all of sub-saharan africa together because "dey black"
Spam him don't ruin the kids life for "not being that guy" save a child user
My body, my choice bitch, circumcision is a complete violation of human rights.
save the boy user!
This basically if you want to get cut by all means do it but don't cut off my dick as a baby you goddanm subhumans
let's not forget about the cherry on top
>FGM frequently involves complete removal of the clitoris, as well as additional cutting and stitching of the labia resulting in a constricted vaginal opening.
>The procedures are linked to extensive and in some cases lifelong health problems (191). The immediate complications include severe pain, shock, haemorrhage, tetanus or sepsis, urine retention, ulceration of the genital region and injury to adjacent tissue.Haemorrhage and infection can be of such magnitude as to cause death (191).
It makes an argument for male genital mutilation stating better than female genital mutilation but then makes a comparison between them praising male mutilation done in clinical conditions with trained personnel (which is obviously the recommended method of conducting any surgery regardless of how necessary it is) and comparing it with female mutilation when done by some braindead goatfucker wielding a sharp piece of broken glass in a backalley.
They're not even hiding it, Jesus Christ.
>The report was written by Helen Weiss, Jonny Polonsky, [...] Daniel Halperin and George Schmid.
>We also thank the following for their written comments: David Alnwick, [...] Inon Schenker and Charles Shey Wiysonge.
Should I be surprised?
>It's entire basis for "cutfags have less HIV" is based on the data comparison between few different countries
No, its based on 37 different WHO approved studies, including randomized control trials, strength of evidence rated +++, see Table 3.
>this study is non objective piece of garbage written by someone with an agenda.
Its a review piece, it includes hundreds of studies on the subject. It is not a single study. It is "written by" the literal World Health Organization and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.
Nice try though
what did you make it out of? i'm curious to try new methods, I sometimes find it hard to stay consistent with what i'm doing
UN is a meme
kill yourself
How would your life be any different if you did/didn't have a foreskin?
Top portion of a 1 liter soda bottle(place frenuleum cut out) to hold the head
A bolt and nut to hold washers
Washers for weight
Baby bottle top( silicon ) to hold the skin
I'd know that my genitals weren't mutilated by my parents who are supposed to love and protect me
Save him user!
>well, am i wrong?
you stated an opinion. being addicted to porn is not the only possible reason to feel embittered by having your body violated and permanently damaged for no reason other than social pressure and doctors wanting to profit off of your parents' ignorance.
if having a foreskin is no better than being circumcised then why do euros ridicule americans for it and pity them for needing lube to masturbate? isn't the prevention of masturbation the commonly believed reason for the practice existing, or at least one of them?
He's been my best friend since we were both in pre-school (we're in our mid-20s now). I'd feel really bad if I spammed him with stuff (even if it is true stuff).
Besides, his baby mama will probably have final say. I've never even met her.
Doesn't matter tell him about the harms of circumcision and how it causes depression in some cases.
Aesthetically looks better
The head of my dick is irritated from the friction with my boxer briefs
Decreased sensitivity
My dick is an abomination
don't spam just tell your friend that it is not good idea
it's very painful to baby i doubt your friend would knowingly cause pain to his tiny child
Both look identical when erect. Who is checking out your flaccid dick so much that you care what it looks like mast down?
Tell him about the probe they use to rip the frenulem and show the difference between a circumcised an uncircumcised head
The probe is what convinced my friend
There are literally no drawback and no benefits, you retard
This. Ask him if he's ready to punch the baby because "it wont remember it anyway".
Because it's my dick user,I don't like the way it looks
And no,they don't look the fucking same erect.
How would your life be any different if you got your external ear cut?
You could still hear, right? Well, but you'd have a loss of hearing.
No part of human body is a "useless flap of skin" for fuck's sake.
If you think your foreskin is useless cut it yourself, but it's bizarre to force such irreversible change on children.
this
you can search "infant circumcision" and see how much these babies are in pain
I'm referring to the prevalence of dicussion about circumcision on Yas Forums, don't you think it's more than a coincidence?
I'm not saying that being circumcised is better - it's not - but unlike removing parts of your limbs etc., removing your foreskin doesn't disable you in any way, so in a sense it's more like getting your ear or button-belly pierced, which also involve permanent damage to the body
Also i'm cut and don't have to use lube at all, but maybe you do need lube if you'remasturbating excessively (like more tha 2 times a day)
You're never getting it back amerimutt, you have the mark of the jew for life >:)
Slicing off the top of your nose and a your nipples won't "disable" you,you dont make a good point
piercing infant ears or belly button should be illegal too
at least these aren't very painful
I know I won't which is why I want to kill all Jews
checked
also who got ?