How do they compare?

How do they compare?

Attached: E68266C1-FB82-47F9-9E09-9A7FB9B1D7DC.png (4110x3600, 1.85M)

They're both pretty fucked up, honestly. Beastars just goes into the technicalities because more time was afforded to fleshing out the story.

Other one is supposed to be romantic/sexual attraction, other one is just friends.

Beastars is better at world building.

Although Zootopia's original "tame collars" was a good idea.

well one of em is fucking garbage so really anything is better in comparison

Never heard of them?

This.

Attached: bears.png (861x561, 459.37K)

zootopia starts as a buddy cop flick and then becomes a transparent analogy for white genocide
beastars starts off as a tale about people being slaves to their destructive sex drives and then becomes baki with animal people
zootopia characters are cute
beastars characters are intentionally grotesque
both are simultaneously flick and kino

>White genocide
Using animals as a proxy for humans was a mistake.

Beastars is grostesque because walking manimals are a grostesque concept.

A chicken head on a human body is not a pretty thing