Where do YOU personally, not general statements but your own standards and definition...

I use Sonichu as a guide.

The closer you are to Sonichu, the more you're in plagiarism territory.

Attached: 200px-SonichuOriginal.jpg (200x308, 27.61K)

>bastard that actually talks
>no hand-held accessory
>sometimes just a "cat" and sometimes a child when the episode calls for it
>consistently pathetic therefore represents the world of the small to contrast with Luz and Eda
>unknown if the worn skull is a part of him or a kill prize
King is barely a character, but he's clearly not a collectible object

>has actual goals like fame and fortune instead of obsessing over a generic japanese teenager
>not interested in any romance, passes the Bechdel Test
>lack of a need to depend on someone is severe enough to be a flaw at having a lack of concern for herself
>despite being wanted by the regime, demonstrates an understanding of enough rules to bend them and exploit loopholes to live in comfort under the regime's nose
>has a history such as childhood, instead of materializing out of a lab test tube
>isn't a part of a harem, it could be argued other characters belong in her harem
>is a slob
>hair design integrates into the owl monster design without being a 1:1 carryover
>isn't looking for a fight, tries to avoid confrontation but if forced to fight she will end it on her own terms
Can you honestly claim Ryoko is a better character than Eda, even when Eda lifts superficial details from Ryoko's appearance?

You forgot the main character.

Attached: luke the cuck.png (593x475, 180.67K)

Plagiarism is when the creator has nothing to say and is stealing from better material as a crutch.
Inspiration is when you can tell the creator has their own take on something and is still attempting to do something meaningful.

Basically, plagiarized works add nothing meaningful to the concepts they're stealing from, while inspired works still can.

You don't and that is my point. Everything stems from something else. Nothing is so completely disconnected from everything that came before it that it can truly be original. And thus the term original itself loses meaning, everything becomes original if you change even the smallest detail.

Attached: character_archetypes1.jpg (1500x3002, 724.31K)

What is that?

stupid

not stupid

Korean Batman. A rip off cartoon of DC comics.

Golden Batman.
It's his literal name

Luz's design was revealed a year before that Pokemon's character, Luke

Someone requested:

Sun Devils 004 (1984) (Digital) (Shadowcat-Empire).cbz
www77.zippyshare.com/v/YqdwI02k/file.html

>owl house was basically teased for 5 years
>genderfluid pokemon character only has a single trailer late Q4 from last year before they aired it'
surely no one is stupid enough to not only believe a twitter screencap but also save the image to their harddrive has some kind of irrefutable evidence right. right?
desuarchive.org/co/search/image/l4tWXmQqr-AxY3KjVD676A/

Nobody wants your facts. Just because you're right, you think you're right?

Ok, I understand comparing King to Cubone, but comparing Eda to that anime lady is just ridiculous. That character didn’t invent that hairstyle, nor that body type

There's drawing evidence that suggests Luz has looked like this as far back as 2016. The only thing this proves is that Dana's art style is influenced by generic anime design.

>. Just because you're right, you think you're right?
I assume

Dana said at the Comic Con Panel before TOH premiered that she was inspired by Ryoko.

>even pokemon has to have le ebin token femboi uwu owo uguu
I hate gays so much

I've got nothing going on right now, laying about during the stayhome orders, is this show worth watching?

No, only fapping to

Like the other user is saying, it's pretty unlikely that you will because people have made a lot of stuff.

But why do you need to make something original? I get it from a pride standpoint but honestly, fuck that feeling off and you'll be all the better for it. Instead, take notes from what has done your idea - what you liked, what you disliked - and incorporate that into your shit.

If one guy copies something then its plagiarism. If a hundred guys copy something then its an archetype.

So when the canon of your character literally involves the canon of at least two official characters.

I would agree with this. I mean, look at something like The Boys. There are characters that are supposed to be "Wonder Woman" or "The Flash", but they also offer something more than just being a discount Wonder Woman or whatever.

I have a large array of stories that I want to but will most likely never ;_; put into at least writing, hopefully comics, and I always try to blend ideas. For example, I have one that's mostly a standard medieval magic fantasy, but one of the main characters starts off as a noob to magic, starts learning to become the magician type, but begins to adopt a blend of those warrior and rebel mindsets after certain plot events.
I have a thing for large changes in character, basically.

very stupid