Defend this

Defend this.

Attached: Introducing_the_New_New_Warriors_Marvel_-_2020-04-24_21.50.04.jpg (1565x6357, 1.55M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5PCWUCv1rnU&t=16s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Another new warriors thread. I'm so excited for the original posts that this will sprawl. Surely this wont be a circle jerk.

it was made ironically as a joke bro hahaha

I just want to see the opinions of people who genuinely enjoy this type of content. That's all. I'm not here to stir up any shit personally.

It's a set-up to put them through the wringer. They'll be unlikable so you'll root for the villain who destroys them in both body and soul.

>Defend this
Why? I was never going to read it

Why? It looks like shit, We all know it's going to be shit, so why even discuss it

b-negative is the least bad one of the group.

when old white people try to be woke...

i agree

homoerotic screentime/B-negative spinoff when?

What's wrong with them?
They're original characters instead of sjw-ify versions of previous characters.
We want them to make their own characters for them.
These aren't for us.

oh fuck yea, ive been meaning to get some feed back my names for the fat one
*ahem*
mini blob, blubber-naut, buffet blazer, and gorda the explora

Who are they for?

And once they fail, they'll go straight back to trying to hijack existing characters, because there's a reason they have to do that. No one is interested in what they create.

impressionable kids

H-haha, funny joke guys. You can say it's april fool's now, haha.

>What's wrong with them?
Have you looked at them? There's very little not wrong with them. The one closest to being "okay" is B-Negative, and his stupid name is like something from a sunday morning cartoon villain than what's supposed to be a "cool" comic for teenagers.

And that's the biggest problem, this doesn't appear to be parody or irony, this is a sincere, legitimate attempt at a action comic for teens... and it fails completely. It's far too out of touch. It may be touching upon issues teens care about, but with the grace and elegance (and intelligence) of a enraged bull.

trailblazer is just a shitty green lantern, except she can't do anything remotely cool or flashy. get that bitch out of here, even screentime has more going for him.

Pay up
5:08am, Eric aims shoe, lets newtonian esper-ism do the dirty job.

Attached: RCO003_1582359032.jpg (1338x1012, 443.56K)

>introduce fat character
>ass shots is literally the only way to advertise her
lmao.

it doesn't matter who are they for, they aren't for us.
There is not a "uh maybe I'm the person who is suppossed to like thi-".
These characters have been made just and only for the writers, not for you or anyone else

>this doesn't appear to be parody or irony
then actually read the description of the comic, it's a parody of reclaimable terms.

>No one is interested in what they create.
and so?
We aren't suppossed to be interested, when a writer creates something like this is because he has a vision.
And if you know what a vision was you would know visions can't be good or bad but not being liked by someone who doesn't share the same vision

> you would know visions can't be good or bad
This comic proves you wrong!

You're kind of naive to think "it's fine if they want to create something without an audience!" The goal is to make money. If nobody is interested in a vision, that vision is pointless.

We can write them letters again like with america

This is giving people exactly what they want, so that they might stop wanting it.

>This comic proves you wrong!
no, I still have to read it.
>The goal is to make money. If nobody is interested in a vision, that vision is pointless.
that's not how a vision works.
If it were like that then George Lucas wouldn't complain about JJ Abrahms destroying his lore since he still gets paid for it

>that's not how a vision works.
I'm sorry, but the only reason people discuss "Star Wars" from a vision perspective in the first place is because at one point in history, people cared about it. I find it interesting you chose "Star Wars"... a franchise with such a sizable fanbase. I doubt even you realize why you used that as your example.

>This project is announced.

>2 weeks later corona destroys the comics industry.

It's like pottery.

Attached: 1586053788878.jpg (640x425, 104.2K)

people care about marvel too

>B-Negative
>Be Negative
Holy shit I finally got it.

>prove me right!
clowns defending the clown world.

am i being trolled here? like, is this a real thing?

i doubt anyone in their right mind would make a serious comic with a character whose name is basically "token" like the dude from south park

it's a parody

Totally real, dude.

youtube.com/watch?v=5PCWUCv1rnU&t=16s

>grandpa's experimwntal gas
xDDD

ironic shitposting is still shitposting

Tell that to whoever is writing New Warriors.

It's outrage marketing, and you're falling for it. It's genuinely very easy to make money off of reactionaries.

HOW?

This isn't some clickbait website selling add space. I thought the idea was to move some comics. Nobody is going to buy this trash.

While I do agree that it is better that they make original characters, since the big issue with these retards is that they normally insist on taking existing characters and property and claiming it for themselves, I think most people are just outright mocking it for how stupid it is rather than be pissed about it.

Hell, I think most here want this to be released just so they can laugh as they watch it all burn down since I doubt anyone will buy the comics.

so is Lobo, but he doesn't suck