I don't hate the new Looney Tunes Cartoons' use of tweening, I'm just disappointed

The exploit may or may not be a jape, but nobody wants to take any chances so.
I wish people would be actually looking through the source code instead of fearmongering.

Attached: soldier bro.png (1114x1838, 636.05K)

Why does your webm feature no motion tweening?

>muh animation
I'm more worried about the actual jokes.

Attached: 1557154515912.jpg (1470x1080, 252.45K)

so are new one-off characters not going to happen?
looney tunes wasnt bugs and daffy all the time. stuff like owl jolson, the dover boys, and an itch in time were just as good

>It feels like there's a focus on "higher FPS" versus "good animation,"
Two things work against good animation these days. First, good animation really depends on the skill of the director-keyframer, and that skill is often in short supply and improperly allocated, if the position exists at all. Something also must be said of the fortitude of the older generation who worked from the bottom up and honed their skill and speed by inbetweening, something that doesn't exist here anymore in the era of offshoring.
Second, because of offshoring, the director, storyboarders, and keyframers are no longer working side-by-side with the actual animators. Those animators aren't allowed to make creative decisions, so any kind of ambiguity or sloppiness on the part of the direction or storyboarding is going to carry over.

You won't find people like me anymore, user, especially now that Don Bluth and Richard Williams are dead.

All companies want to cut corners.

Animation is dead.

>people like me
who the hell are you

>muh animation
why are you even here?

In one of the preview pictures, Cicero Pug appeared. As far as I'm concerned, it's too early to say one way or another. They're obviously going to focus on the big names for the advertising, but it's possible that some one off stuff would appear amongst all the shrts.

Attached: Coyote overwatch.png (1286x715, 622.74K)

Because Looney Tunes is funny slapstick, it's not meant to be high-brow animation.

>implying Looney Tunes didn't have good animation
>implying animation isn't important for slapstick
god damn user think before you post

so the animation studio situation on LTC:
Yowza Animation: A Toronto studio primarily known for doing additional animation work for various 2D films (like the turn of the millennia WB films, including Looney Tunes Back in Action, some mid-00s DisneyToon dtv films, Disney's 2D stuff at the turn of the 10's, the occasional other 2D film like The 3 Wise Men and Klaus, etc). TV show level work they've done includes Welcome to the Wayne and Green Eggs and Ham

Tonic DNA: A prestige Montreal animation studio formerly known as Studio Pascal Blais. Was also on Green Eggs and Ham.

Snipple: Filipino studio that mostly animates on WB shows (usually standard TV Grade stuff, but they were on Green Eggs and Ham). Their most notable non-WB work is being one of the studios on Ducktales 2017

Yearim: Korean studio that's been on nearly every single 21st century Looney Tunes tv show

there's also a small in-house team of retake animators: Joey Capps (who's also the show's animation supervisor), Skip Jones, Chris Wahl, and likely some FX animators as well

>no american studio
it's shit

Chris Allison is a storyboard artist, not a director

boarder Mike Ruocco does talk about the tweening twitter.com/AGuyWhoDraws/status/1252762777308942336?s=20

It shows what the best of the animation looks like.
And here's the worst of it.

Attached: worst.webm (640x360, 374.52K)

slapstick is conveyed visually you fucking retard

>MUH BUDGET
>MUH NOT OBVIOUS
>IT DOESN'T MATTER
Lots of cope going on here.

hes pretty much complaining about the complainers, but he shot his own argument down in his first tweet
>In regards to the "Harmony vs. Drawn" debate, only a few things matter to me: 1) How well can it be done in regards to it's budget? 2) Can it be easily fixed if something isn't working? 3) Are your cheats obvious? 4) It doesn't matter how it works as a still, only in motion.
people wouldnt be complaining if the tweening wasnt obvious

>You get a LOT more leeway with Harmony rigs. Easing, consistency, and best of all, retakes are a lot less painful. It all depends on the animator and the complexity of the rig. And just because it’s a rig doesn’t mean you can’t break it, or draw a new pose or asset.
calling it now this is the fucker who pushed for rigged animation

Attached: 39.webm (1920x1080, 1.12M)

there IS the small in-house retake animation team

The big LA studios don't animated in-house anymore outside of retakes (and even then some studios don't even do that); probably the biggest studio that's willing to is Titmouse. and most domestic studios usually use tweening.

Green Eggs and Ham didn't use any american studios (outside of having a similar in-house retake animation team). Hell 3 of the 4 studios are the same between the 2 shows (Green Eggs and Ham using a French studio called Folimage instead of Yearim)

I think the only time in recent history that WB's outsourced to a domestic studio is half of Unikitty being animated at Renegade Animation (the non-Renegade eps being animated at Snipple). Though apparently Titmouse is involved in animating season 2 of Green Eggs and Ham (Snipple also returning)

An insane autistic attention whore, just filter it.

Nope, is still bad animation.

Attached: 1587510483664.webm (640x360, 253.69K)

I think the scene where daffy hits porky with a drum looks worse desu

he's only a storyboard artist, doesn't have the power to make such a call (in the past he's actually talked about how it's actually easier for him personally to animate by hand rather than using puppet rigs)

Worth noting that it's not gonna be all puppet rigs; it'll probably vary by overseas studio

Attached: 94340962_590561668223447_320371049228898364_n.jpg (1080x1350, 315.59K)