Do Robots have rights?

>implying they would ever give a consumer product human thought especially when it's probably just cheaper to give it the unthinking illusion of human thought

An AI cannot feel anything beyond it's own programming. which is to say that it feels in the same way a toaster can feel if that toaster was programmed to give you the feedback that mimics human life.

While question existence is part of the mimicking human emotions. It still doesn't mean that any of those emotions aren't programmable or controllable.

The same cannot be said for human beings.

Therefore, Robots cannot have rights because they never had sentience to begin with. Sentience cannot be proven within the bounds of programming.

Attached: 836db4b6bd69e8d78fc77157df9e1e10.jpg (236x377, 22.65K)

Humans don't have souls.
That's just some fantasy that the ancients came up with.

>tfw in "robots are real human bean" stories companies give robots conscience for no reason or when conscience is glitched into existence.

Attached: im tired.png (519x533, 277.32K)

MUH ROBOT RIGHTS
is (white) men gripping with the reality that other races have sentience

I've always wonderes why otakus are portrayed with big lips.

no. and don't get attached.

Attached: 79e580df1215d473b616e72a787d9378.jpg (500x672, 50.81K)

THIS

creating sentience is an oxymoron. This is why I hate west world. You really can't create something that sentient. You can only build something that mimics sentience

Are humans not robots of flesh and blood how are our neurons any different from their wires?

>t.jew