Peak human

Umm we can and we have there a tons of tamed lions in the world and it isn't an American thing

I agree with you. It is my position with biological divisions it is about frequency or traits within phenotype groups.
But, that is beside the point. The point was that the person I was responding to literally said that there is no person, living or in principle, who could have the highest position in a hierarchy of rank of positive attributes.

frequency of*

I'm not saying you can't tame lions, but Americans think they can effortlessly do anything, so unqualified Americans would try if they had the opportunity to just buy a lion and keep them around.

You're describing stupid people not americans it just so happens it's easier to get a lion, tiger, or exotic animal in America because we captured a bunch of them and breed the fuck out of them

Reporting in.

Based deforestationCHAD

Attached: 74C414D8-501A-472C-9E3F-790B29F70544.jpg (1988x3056, 1.29M)

This is possible in real life, you just need more muscle than is shown on picture.
youtube.com/watch?v=iONb4Yw8ywU

That's not how that works. Being big and muscular doesn't mean you can hit or strike harder. I'm fairly sure no human can actually kick through a tree in one swing when it is that thick and maybe made out of oak. How does a strongman who specializes in grip strength and explosive strength being able to fold a frying pan equate to this inhuman display of technique and martial arts power.

>Being big and muscular doesn't mean you can hit or strike harder.

Attached: fac612be32e1de2df5413f26dc3d0610.jpg (720x303, 26.63K)

Okay yes being bigger than someone does mean that if you hit something in the exact same way at the exact same speed your punch would hit harder, but being bigger does not mean you can hit harder than someone smaller because that smaller person might actually know how to properly throw a punch and a kick using their weight to it's fullest while most big guys with little martial arts knowledge don't know how to properly use their bodies mass to hit harder than the smaller opponent.

For instance this video talks about how Bruce Lee could potentially launch a punching bag through the roof now could Eddie Hall do that? Hell no. Because Bruce knows how to use his weight and speed

>Being big and muscular doesn't mean you can hit or strike harder.
achshually
It is a mater of biomechanics. First the leg is what you want to do it with. It is the strongest appendage you can strike with. Next of all it is not just about the striking power within the legs. Using a rotation of the hips you add the strength of your core and use your upperbody as a followthrough/counter weight with a spinning roundhouse kick you get the strength of your legs, hips, and the force of the upper body all multiplied by the momentum of your big self into that tree and it will break.

I got my first dan black belt in tae kwon do, and preformed on a stunt team and didn't do any competitive fighting. But, in a fight you will see roundhouse kicks a lot because you don't telegraph that much(comparatively) and you can use it to advance your foot position if it doesn't get a solid connection. In addition you aren't going to see roundhouse kicks to the head and more to the upper or lower legs. However if you were to do a kick that had a big telegraph and most prep time it would be devastating. The most you would ever see would be a spinning back kick, which if for some reason got through could rupture your organs if it makes contact with the torso. But a spinning roundhouse kick would basically break rips, cause trama to the liver and basically put you on the ground.. Breaking a tree in principle would be do able with the right mass, strength training, and spinning roundhouse technique.

>exact same way at the exact same speed
>don't hit hard please
Again the warrior's armchair shows complete ignorance of physics and biomechanics. Say also that the katana is made for speed, and the European swords for brute force and will be a complete set of idiots.

What the fuck are you talking about? The sword thing doesn't even make sense because when you say katana you refer to one type of blade but there are dozens of "european" swords

Even in its own Universe, Batman isn't peak, is he?
Captain America is peak because magic serum bullshit.
Batman is debatable but claimed world strongest normalo guy. He doesn't necessary hit the human limit.

This katana meme shows complete ignorance of the speaker in simple things. If someone says that katana is an elegant weapon that is made for fast fencing, not for brute force like European swords, then it means that the speaker is just an idiot who has not even studied physics at school.

>batman
>even in his own universe
>captain america

Attached: movie.jpg (1400x1400, 119.68K)

Bruh that's retarded. Imagine thinking your sword made from shitty metal you have to fold to make it actually usable is superior cause all the strong fictional characters use them.

Welcome to Yas Forums.

He's probably some europoor that saw Tiger King last week and now thinks he knows everything about Americans.

>Batman
>Super strong but not peak strength in his universe
>Captain America
>Peak strength in his universe

this

Attached: bat chad.jpg (900x698, 94.72K)

I wasnt a peak Tree

Why go through the effort of training a breed that routinely chimps out when you can have a different breed that doesn't require training to act like a civilized pet?