Who had the better worldbuilding?

Who had the better worldbuilding?

Attached: hxwwpxzk0jn41.png (4110x3600, 1.85M)

Other urls found in this thread:

quora.com/What-do-carnivores-in-Zootopia-eat/answer/Zootopia
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Nick looks like he's been hitting the opium

Beastars. At least they actually show what carnivores eat. Beastars is superior.

But both series are bad because of the multiculturalism bullshit and Judy is shit.

Beastars but Zootopia was restricted as it was meant for children. The original Zootopia plot sounded much more interesting.

That's because Disney murdered animation in the West. Thanks to those bastards most western animation is considered shit for brats.

world building? beastars because they had more time to do so

beastars

quora.com/What-do-carnivores-in-Zootopia-eat/answer/Zootopia

Zootopians eat fish.
>But both series are bad because of the multiculturalism bullshit and Judy is shit.
OK kid.

That's the thing, Beastars is NOT afraid to show the carnivores eating meat on screen. Disney being for pussies? They just can't show what the carnivores do for protein not even showing them eating eggs. Disney is shit.

Beastars technically has better worlduilding, but BOY was it delivered in a terrible manner.
The exposition in zootopia felt -kinda- natural.
The exposition in Beastars boils down to a character looking at the camera and say
>Yes! We Mangooses do indeed have an ancient feud with the Snakes that routinely causes many deaths! It is a conflict that has lasted since time immemorial and all of our culture is based on it! I personally hate all snakes, and there are many snakes who hate me similarly! If I were to ever meat a snake, I would kill them as a revenge for all the murders they commited against me!
and it is all spoken to a snake, in the middle of snake town.

i was so BORED by beastars

the furries deserve nothing

zootopia worldbuilding is derivative, generic and shallow

Beastars has more going for it being that it's an ongoing manga and not a single movie. Zootopia is better visually because, y'know, they actually look like animals.

Attached: beastars.png (599x599, 90.31K)

THIS. It's multiculturalism from upper-class whites

this. God, the beastars caracter designs make me so uncomfortable.

Disney knew he would never be allowed to make stories for adults and lamented it during his own life. Zootopia reflects this.
Beastars has had every advantage and only used a handful of them.

>multiculturalism bad
Found the white person

Attached: 1586766997302.gif (2056x2733, 2.33M)

>Zootopia is better visually because, y'know, they actually look like animals.
They don't, at all.

Attached: judy.png (794x338, 386.78K)

Chinese confirmed white

I should have they're closer to the animals they're based on, and that makes for more interesting visual world-building. At least compared to Beastars.

Attached: Tonight's top story - Furry threads run rampant on ⁄co⁄ and the disturbing silence from moderators and staff.jpg (638x781, 80.72K)

Right because of all the people we want to emulate it's the fucking Chinese huh

>Disney knew he would never be allowed to make stories for adults

That's his own fault and damn him to hell for condemning western animation as mostly being shit for brats. No wonder Western Adults view all animation as garbage for the young.

The day Disney dies will be a great day for Western Animation, shame they didn't die in the years before the shitty Renaissance that revived them. Disney is shit.

agree on the delivery point. Also how the hell legoshi didn't know about the black market until he was 17? his grandpa would definitely teach about that and train him to deal with his instincts

>anime is better because it has REAL violence in it and you can hit girls and see their panties and EVERYTHING!!!
you must be 18+ to post here

you are the big gay lol

What was the original plot?

mafia related shenanigans

this is basically anime vs. western summarized

Zootopia isn't a story about how carnivores who are forced to live into species integrated society and how they deal with it and their primitive urges. It's a detective story about the first bunny cop in a big animal city. It's literally established in the first minute that all animal savagery is gone in this world. Wolves don't have the urge to snack on their students in the first place.

>Weebs think adding animals to their cartoons is revolutionary
Is anime this shallow?

This is how most anime tells stories. Lots of inner monologues, narration, exposition, characters stopping the action to start talking about what they're doing on-screen.

Now, I'm not an expert on Eastern storytelling, but I'm going to take a guess that because a lot of anime is (sometimes closely) adapted from manga, that they're keeping a lot of the writing that was in the source material-- and manga/comics have a habit of using narration and exposition as a way to convey things to the audience in a small number of drawings.

Attached: 453534534.jpg (1876x2777, 2.04M)

>This is how most anime tells stories. Lots of inner monologues, narration, exposition, characters stopping the action to start talking about what they're doing on-screen.

There's a great moment in Beastars where the wolf is internally monologuing to himself about his nature while he's got this cheetah pinned down on the floor. Half way through, his monologue is interupted when the cheetah decks him in the face. I wish more anime would do that.

There's also an earlier version about a rabbit spy, completely unrelated to the Zootopia we got.

Attached: 1458114840420.jpg (1720x5768, 3.49M)

considering how different the species are they would definitively end up in a rigid cast system

anime can be sensationalist, yes.
not all that much difference with seth mcfartlane trying to shock you with violence or gross out humor.
beastars is pretty tame and modest compared to most anime.
it ends up as a fighting shonen anyway so it isn't like that matters now,