How can Pixar compete with THIS level of CGI?
How can Pixar compete with THIS level of CGI?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
awn.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
You mean that's not just a photograph of a real place?
Nope.
With particles effects out the ass and barbie doll tier hair
Embrace Art Deco
Damn this looks insane
Genuinely thought it was a photo
Wont matter though, Pixar has a stranglehold on the public eye
My mom literally refuses to watch animated shit but says "I love Pixar"
She actually sees them as "realistic" more than animation which is insane to me
It's only a model.
SHUSH
They fucking can't. The guys who made those bumpers are one of the biggest animation studios in hollywood right now. They made the Lego movies, did CGI work for several marvel films, as well as a ton of other projects
this is what Scoob's gonna look like?
Indeed: the junglelike intricacies of Soul's Brownstones ain't got shit on this sexiness.
It's not.
Nope. All CGI
>How can Pixar compete
Why should they?
This is the mentality that has ruined the videogame industry: it HAS to have state-of-the-art realistic CGI or it's crap, and likewise that quality of CG = quality of the product as a whole.
I'd much rather something with a defined, consistent style, even if it's low poly, than "muh realistik" brown bloom crap.
I want to impregnate both Ami and Yumi
Based.
Still modeled
are you trolling or something
it looks good but how can you even think for a second "yeah this is real"
Take your meds, your autism is showing.
this looks like shit
they can't even compete with rango.
Like fuck it is, all CGI in mainstream is plasticky, ultra colorful abstract shit, the only realistic CGI movie in recent memory was fucking Rango. Animators are pussies and producers are jews and nobody has it in them to make a gritty, realistic animated movie.
Maybe they weren't wearing they're glasses
Japan is trying to catch up
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
Photorealistic CGI is overrated. It's the kind of thing that people bash live-action movies with all the time. Pixar's mandate is to be an animation studio first, not a VFX house. The amount of effort put into making a cityscape look cartoony trumps any attempt to make it look photo-real.
Animal Logic? For real?
i dont understand the point of photoreal animated movies either, just buy a fucking video camera.
Cgi is good for cartoons. It bad in live action when EVERYTHING is cgi.
Reminder that the CGI Lupin movie was made overseas by the Chinese. Japs only did storyboards.
What's the point of making ultra-realistic CG? At a certain point it just makes more sense for it to be live-action.
Nobody can compete with Rango.
The thumbnail made be think that this was from Gmod
What? No, it was animated by Marza, which is mostly a game CG company, but they're a Japanese company.
CN city was such an absurdly comfy era for cartoon network. Maybe it's just my nostalgia talking but god damn.
Pretty lazy copypaste job. None of the buildings were designed to be used in an urban setting. They were generic assets designed with no intention of being used to build a cohesive world. They could've got the same effect if they bought a cheap Unity asset pack.
No it was. Powerhouse too.
Based Aussies
Honestly minecraft can have comparable graphics with some shades, it's not that impressive.
based Lupin poster
majority of CG is super boring these days.
everyone is just following the exact same industry standard shit instead of actually innovating (rendering wise for instance)
Kek.
I don't know why your laughing, I'm not joking.
youtube.com
youtu.be
Cute thing, here's a bigger version
>Mystery Machine
>it's a Warner Bros. animation
well I mean basically what WB do is they set up an animation division, then they make insane demands from it, and then when it doesn't meet those demands they just shut it down to save money
they've done it like five times already, so Pixar just has to wait and poof! no more WB animations for a decade
Animal logic is an independent studio..
And they've consistently blown Pixar out of the water in animation quality.
The piss filter makes it look extra realistic.
Of course it looks amazing at 480p resolution. If you rendered it to today's standards, the low-resolution textures and polygonal models would be obvious. It only looks good because of the inferiority of the broadcasting technology at the time.
Animal Logic does visual effects, not animation.
It's TV CG during the mid-2000s, it looks good for what it is
Can't find a better quality but Eustace's seed and feed
>What is Soul
youtube.com
That shit looks way better than that outdated render ripped straight out of CSGO and Fallout.
>Formerly King Ramses' (The Man in Gauze (The Man in Gauze))
You sound gay
Onward was a flop even before Coronachan kicked it out of theaters.
I've been trying to ignore that movie
It looks pretty good desu
Looks like a video game to be honest
kek
What Grand Theft Auto: IV mod is this?