What. Went. Wrong?
What. Went. Wrong?
Andrew Gonzalez
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Matthew Ross
>Filing off all of the signature edge to make a generic family-friendly kids movie, lacking all of the charm of the original games
>Changing Ratchet's motivation into being all about the galactic rangers
>Removing much of Clank's subplot, including meeting his mother
>Downplaying Captain Quark's betrayal to take advantage of his heel-face turn in the later games
>Similarly, giving Drek the boot and shoehorning in Dr Nefarious at the last minute as the movie's villain
Andrew Clark
everything that possibly could go wrong
goblin nefarious's design was nice though
Gavin Gutierrez
Is it true that people initially hated Ratchet's characterization from the first game, but then preferred it when the movie changed it?
Carson Jackson
It's an animated movie based on a video game, that's what went wrong.
Henry Perry
Absolutely everything. What a dissapointment
Luis Flores
Insomniac writers felt Ratchet in the original was too much of a cunt throughout the most of it, so they softened him a bit to make his friendship with Clank more believable and gave him a newer VA
Jackson Cruz
This. Even then, Ratchet's personality in the games from GC onward were nowhere near as soft and inoffensive as the movie and 2016 tie-in game were.
Nathaniel Perez
Overshadowed by the game itself... Also, the game had the movie cutscenes, too.
Jordan Perez
They replaced the anti-capitalist satire with a generic story about being a hero. Ratchet and Clank's character arcs were removed to give Qwark more to do. Forcing Dr. Nefarious as a main antagonist instead of building him up.
The tie-in game was so much better than the movie and even then it was held back by it.