This looks so painfully generic

Seeing as John Witherspoon died, I would imagine the Boondocks revival will be postponed for a bit.

unless you're a girl it ain't happening.

>sunny with a chance of meatballs
obvious bait

She could be bi

It looks like a cereal commercial

dilate

Give me one reason why this movie needed to be CG instead of 2D? You just know once you get to the end credits those bastards are going to flaunt their hand drawn animation like no one's business.

Attached: 1584593669299.jpg (640x480, 60.08K)

It's sony. That's their thing. The exception being spiderverse and that's only because it had choppy animation with some filters

And? It's an animated movie, that's all it needs.

Wrong answer!

How long until the boy gets lewds?

>fagbadge
Will it be woke to broke YET AGAIN!?

Attached: 1518770732237.gif (530x257, 3.14M)

It doesn't look that generic when it comes to it's artstyle at least. It seems like they're trying to go for a unique look, rather than just attempting to copy the samey late 2010's Pixar/Disney style that all other companies are attempting to copy.

But I'll have to agree on the story though. The story itself seems to be a run of mill road trip movie with a generic technology takeover plot, except done worse than Netflix's robot movie.

Attached: 1584331339945.png (405x405, 112.09K)

How long until it comes to Disney+?

>actually wanting lewds of Mike Rianda

Attached: Kevin_the_Jew.jpg (268x233, 29.74K)

3D costs less and generally earns more. On something with even a shred of originality, those sorts of risk mitigation are inevitable.

>3D costs less
please fuck right off. that's a lie and you're an idiot for believing it.

Attached: 3D films are not cheap.jpg (1006x718, 650.54K)

Boomer Movie

Disney's CG is it's flagship and they can afford to make it higher fidelity in a more demanding rendering style. Connected uses very few textures and simpler geometry. The budgets for 2D and 3D can scale up and down quite a lot but the floor and ceiling are further apart in 3D.

then she would have the bi flag pin
also
>bisexuals
>existing

And the floor for 2d animation is literally 0. Any idiot with a pen and paper can make a traditional animated project, the same literally can't be said about 3d which requires a far higher cost for entry.

2d has and will always be cheaper than 3d animation.

Literally uses the simple most expensive animated film of all time as their example for the pricing of a CG film.

Attached: 1563731362460.png (750x550, 25.12K)

Up and Monsters Vs Aliens released the same year as Princess and the Frog both cost over 70 million dollars more to produce.

>Budget
Is it counting the marketing, by the way?

I think it looks nice, not as bland as other CG films, it looks interesting, what exactly do you find generic from it?

Wasn't Tangled one of Disney's first full-throttle attempt at a full 3D CGI movie? That has to have overhead costs for training included for that.

Hey, im bi.....

Attached: F0F67B63-66CB-4557-BD57-D31D2032577B.jpg (1012x1527, 836.24K)

What movie?

Why do gay people think they own Rainbows? Rainbows are clearly owned by Pepe the frog and maybe Mario Hugo:
youtube.com/watch?v=WMIJG1IdC8I

what is this

Fuck off, cunt.

Attached: 464646.png (290x904, 185.47K)

>Mario Hugo
Hermano chileno basado.

Hey user guess what? The majority of 2D films cost less that than to make

Boomer cartoons

Attached: 1583426162115.jpg (1139x1177, 172.31K)

youtube.com/watch?v=toBGv7yvIV8

Attached: 1583265593838.jpg (600x397, 33.3K)

>Source: user's anus

They really want you to know they made Spider-Verse.

No they don't, retard. The only big Hollywood movie that could compare to that kind of budget was Disney's 2010 Winnie the Pooh.

I'd boom in her pussy.

Can't wait for ted kaczynski to swoop in at the last moment when the family thinks they are doomed to save the day and want the audience about the dangers of technology.

>generic
Name two things that match this art style exactly

Attached: disgust.png (900x900, 711.89K)

>implying bisexuals aren't chads

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_animated_films
Wow look at all the Traditional animated films that can't even make the top 25
>Muh Treasure Planet/Tarzan
Interesting how the most expensive 2D films have a ton of CGI in them isn't it?
Which had a budget 8 million dollars less than captain underpants

Gnomes 3: The riotous cleansing
Over bear Lake

>Top = Average
That's not how it works, sweetie. Also, you should define your budget. I'm pretty sure marketing is also included in that number.

>Top 10 movies are all Disney-owned
So you're retarded? Disney overspends on everything. CG when used by later Dreamworks films and Illumination are cheap.

It's literally just a fusion of Spiderverse and Cloudy.

>Top = Average
If the the most expensive 2d animated films are one average far less expensive than 3d one the means are probably have the same degree of difference.
>I'm pretty sure marketing is also included in that number.
Movie budgets never include marketing

SPA's Klaus cost 40 million to make, that's still half what the average Illumination film costs.

Danny McBride is enormously underrated, so I might give it a chance.

Klaus was made in not America where there is no animation union over a long period of time.

Sausage Party, a CG film, was also made in not America (Canada) outside of an animation guild and had a budget of $19 mil. Half the budget of Klaus.

So fuck off, theatrical CG can be achieved at a much cheaper rate than theatrical 2D. It's also easier to find animators because there is a surplus of CG animators with experience compared to 2D animators.

I hope this movie scores well, makes bux, and wins awards because I know people will be upset over it.

>Why does she have to be a red head though?
what is this meme? i thought red heads were dying off and being replaced with black people or whatever it is co/ likes to gibber about

The dad is way too young to hate technology.

He doesn't hate technology. He even uses a camera to record all their happy memories and plays them back on VHS tapes. He hates that his family can't stop browsing the internet to have breakfast together with some chitchat for 20 minutes.

>Sausage Party
Didn't they undercut the animators?

It should have come out in January as intended

Attached: connected 2020.jpg (1920x1056, 130.42K)

>Muh Treasure Planet/Tarzan
So, what if we add inflation?
usinflationcalculator.com/
>Treasure Planet: $201,305,836.58
>Tarzan: $201,849,579.83
So, there you go.

>Inb4 but it's not the same
What I mean by this is that most of the CG movies came during the last 20 years while most of the traditional animated films in that least are from the early 2000s and bellow. You have to correct the inflation and if you do that correction the budgets are not really that far apart. So, is it expensive because of CGI is more expensive or is it more expensive because they are big animation studios? Keeping in mind what I just mentioned the later is more logic. Not to mention if traditional animation was cheaper then why did it stop to be mainstream among big animation studios?

Yes. And all the major CG American animation studios have had their wages fixed for the last 10+ years. Shitty business practices exist no matter where you're looking.

This movie gonna be awkward because in my family is totally the oposite. I'm the one who tries to keep family chatting during lunch time while my father is fucking obsessed in his cellphone.

The dad looks like one of my co-workers.

You mean CGI/Traditional fusion movies? Pretty sure Disney's been using CGI in their animated movies since at least Beauty and the Beast.

The movie has puppets in it, so it might be okay.

Attached: 1480017629388.jpg (660x574, 30.86K)

The Mom, Daughter and Son all have the same exact copy and paste face...