Would Kratos and Wonder Woman get along?

Would Kratos and Wonder Woman get along?

Attached: 22557D69-C2D2-473C-9726-9BFD9158B861.jpg (480x470, 86.44K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Rhwdoyp4Ov4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

No. Kratos has god killing autism and if anything he would immediately try to kill her the moment they meet.

at first yes, even if Kratos would be very suspicous about her
after some battles he would appreciate her valor, courage and her will to sacrifice herself
however inevitably there would be a question of killing some random stupid evil god like Ares, Eris, Apollo or even Circe. Diana would try to stop Kratos from killing said godly douchebag, and Kratos would immediately lose his blocks and attack her, treating her as any other adversity to murder

Who would win in a fight?

My money is on Kratos.

He would try to either fuck her or kill her

Depends, PRE-BOI or POST-BOI?

Kratos by the time he had Atreus calmed down immensely. He wouldn't try to kill her unless she started shit first. Even then, he'd likely give her a fair few chances to stop.

Same goes for any sex. Dude's loyal to his wife.

Like oil and water.

It would be like Kratos meets Disney's Hercules.
Nothing bad would happen because the gods they know are different.

WW's gods are cultural appropriation of the gods of my people, Kratos gods are a less offensive cultural appropriation.
But eventually Kratos would kill her because her gods didn't do anything wrong in her continuity (Perez's run isn't canon anymore)

Pre boi is a hard no. Post boi, it would unfold more or less the same as how it happened with freya

Your people smell bad.

But you can use my gods without giving a shit about the people who made them right?

>would kill her
"Wouldn't kill her" I meant. the ESL meme is right I can't type

Dude, I don’t know how to tell you this but the guys who made them are dead

They live inside of my blood

Do you think kratos ever feels self conscious about his one exposed nipple?

Unless you’re a direct descendant no. That’s like me being proud of Thomas Edison because we were both Americans. Don’t piggyback off the dead, cunt.

heres why goku would win....

Attached: download.jpg (221x228, 6.99K)

I'm an aboriginal greek.
My family is here by 600 years, that's enought to be greek both nationally and ethnically

No, you still have no right to be proud of anyone but yourself or your offspring, which you yourself have produced.

And you still didn’t do shit for mythology and I doubt your ancestors did. Do something on your own for once and you can be proud of that.

>I have to work for being worthy of my culture when you can just use it for comic books and videogames without doing absolutely nothing
Interesting......

For the record, this series got pussified after 3. God of War (the new Norse one) is a damn joke now. It tries to make Kratos a serious character when that was never the case, the gore is toned down, nudity is gone, combat is far less varied, and you're shackled to an AI brat

This is like if they make call of duty 200 be a serious well made narrative and you screamed that you couldn't no 360 no scopes anymore

Yeah, it’s free for all, dude. The fact is, no one can claim it as their own. Marvel or DC can’t, Sony can’t, and you definitely can’t. You didn’t do anything. Hell, you’re not even writing an interpretation of your own. You’ve actually put in less effort to expand myth

I'm not sure I follow this analogy

The myth doesn't need expansions, not after the romans that made their own thing. But they were proto-hellenic.
And you don't want to expand them, you want to use them for powerlevel stupidity

I can use them for whatever I want. It’s called public domain. I can have Zeus be whoever I want him to be. And frankly, you don’t get to be upset because he’s not yours. You did nothing and are a hanger on to past accomplishments

But it's so different from "canon" gods that they could be whole different characters already.

>violent fuck vs violent cunt
Their adventure would probably be the gory and sexually explicit version of Hercules and Xena.

Attached: Hercules and Xena.jpg (189x267, 14.39K)

There is no canon. This ain’t the Bible, one whole book, there are so many stories that contradict each other, there’s no main story going on

Kratos when? Because depending on when and how they meet they could fight, fuck, or just be a badass platonic duo. Modern GoW 4 Kratos would likely avoid her and her connection to the Greek gods in particular, but if they got to know each other or were forced to work together they'd respect and be friends by the end.

Then why not using bible characters as well?
Second Coming is the only that did that

Depends on the version of either. I'm of the opinion that GoW 4 Kratos isn't weaker than GoW 3, but he doesn't have some of the overpowered equipment like the Fleece or Hades' whips. If we go with general lore and gameplay then Kratos has at least Lightspeed reaction and enough magic and regen to keep him going. To he honest I know WW scales somewhere around Superman's general level when he's not breaking the story, but beyond that I don't know her feats or powers and I'd rather not peek at VsBW. Fully wanked out, full equipment Kratos would win, chilled out holding back Kratos would not.

>Kratos by the time he had Atreus calmed down immensely
I thought his rage was more focused instead of wildly mindless as it was before

Attached: 1547770165884.jpg (720x747, 131.74K)

Kratos was always a serious character. This is a natural progression of the character. It still has plenty of gore and violence. Toned down a bit yeah, but those were icing anyways.

He's also trying to constantly hold back, first because he doesn't want to reveal his godly power to his son, and second because he doesn't want to lose himself in his rage.

We use Jesus and God all the time. Like every Fox Show. Family Guy did an episode about Jesus having sex with someone’s wife.

He is calmer, and part of that is because he knows what happens when he lets anger blind his reason. Kratos is also old and tired and wants to put his past behind him.

You talking games, comics, or in general? Lucifer for comics, Dante's inferno for games, there you go.

>Kratos was always a serious character
No he wasn't. He was an over the top man child crybaby with one note rage against the gods for shit that was his own fault. People didn't play GoW because Kratos was some nuanced character, they blade for the absurdity and over the top man vs myth action. The new series is gimped and a fucking slow action snoozefest trying to sell story over gameplay

No, he was an over the top angry warrior on the surface that was actually hiding a man built on shame and guilt over his actions, but refused to take his own responsibility until the end. If you think there wasn't an actual in depth story in the trilogy then you either didn't play or you played through once and skipped the cutscenes.

While I agree with the sentiment that he isn't a deep character, I never saw his character being thoughtlessly handled either. There is an earnestness to him being someone who let rage and strength control him. He took it out on (almost literally) everyone else until at the end of 3 he swore to end the cycle of revenge and guilt that kept him killing and seeking more power. The direction they took with him in the new game does feel like it's the character having organically progressed since that point as the other user said.

I imagine a glowing O would appear above wonder woman. After a few grunts and off screen camera shaking Kratos' red orb count would significantly increase.

How would Boi and Wonder Girl get along?

I played the games, multiple times, and no, I didn't skip shit. He never took responsibility in the original trilogy, he fucked over the planet and gave a final fuck you to Athena. God of War wasn't deep storytelling, and they butchered the combat/gameplay in favor of trying to make Kratos something he's not for story driven movie bullshit.
Doesn't matter, they forgot what made GoW popular

>they forgot what made GoW popular
they didn't, they just chose to give him a more interesting plot and their gambit worked.

youtube.com/watch?v=Rhwdoyp4Ov4

t. Turkish rapebaby

no, she could maybe tolerate GOW 4 Kratos

>Juggling is noexistent
>Combos are severely limited
>Can't jump
>Gore toned down
>Dumb color coded enemy weakness DmC shit
>Weapon variety cut
The only good thing I'll give it is the satisfying feeling of calling The Leviathan Ax back. Great for a Thor game, that's about it. But back on topic; if a GAME takes story over actual gameplay, then the game isn't all that great

Attached: 1501280746801.gif (474x379, 470.8K)

>cultural appropriation
Grow up.

Let's not pretend that GoW was a genre defining game.

Meant for

>I don't like the gameplay, therefore it's bad
It's different, yeah, and I'd have preferred the arena/hack'n slash style of old, but it's not bad as-is. Enemy variety is actually important instead of waves of grunts you barely need to worry about. The amount of things you can do with the 3 combat styles makes up for lacking more weapons. About the only thing I'd say is really lacking in gamaplay are the boss fights, besides the Valkyries and the magni-modi fight they're too easy and lack variety.

It sort of was in a way. Not as complex as Devil May Cry's combat, but it got the ball rolling on over the top cinematic set pieces. Hydra, The Colossus, and Poseidon were the great establishing bosses of each game.
>I don't like the gameplay, therefore it's bad
Now you're just trying to strawman me. Fuck off. Enemy variety was great in the past game.
>Undead Soldiers
>Gorgons
>Harpies
>Cyclops
>Satyrs
>Cereberus
And so on. The new game gimps combat because it forces the player to go by the color coded enemy nonsense instead of encouraging creative combos with the weapons you are given as the game progresses. Did you even play the past games?

Pre GoW4 Kratos: No. Though I vaguely recall one of the filler games where he was more chill for some reason but even then probably not

GoW4: He'd mostly try to avoid her. As mentioned they'd probably develop a similar relationship as the one he had with Freya although he'd still be iffy due to her Greek heritage. So long as she didn't mess with him and events didn't spiral like they did with Freya they'd be cool.

He's tired and really doesn't want to fall into his bad habits, especially not in front of Atreus, who already doesn't have a decent impression of him on top of being hilariously prone to soaking in all kinds of negative shit when exposed.

The fact he made a point of not immediately breaking Baldur's spine when he barged in on his home near the very beginning of the game is already a testament to his growth.

It's amazing how you're this close to screaming about "ONIONS" or some other garbage v-tier meme.

You're an absolute retard if you think the new game didn't reinvigorate the series and get a fuckton of interest, both new and old.

>It's amazing how you're this close to screaming about "ONIONS" or some other garbage v-tier meme.
Excuse me? Just because I don't share the same opinion as you, and personally believe the series took a different turn when it shouldn't have, doesn't make me a Yas Forums faggot. Fuck you pal.

I agree the series needed to change, but this wasn't exactly the best way to go. It should have started with Loki from the get go, away from Kratos, and kept in the spirit of the past games combat.

Everyone else thinks it was the right move.

Oh wait, you're just looking for (You)s. Never mind then. I didn't know you spoke for everyone

>It should have started with Loki from the get go, away from Kratos, and kept in the spirit of the past games combat.
That sounds too generic.
"oh no, kratos son turned out to be bad, who would have thought?!!?"
At least right now we're seeing that kratos is actually trying to be a good father to his son instead of just jumping to the point where loki is "evil"

Literally everyone save Yas Forums fucktards (like you) think this was the very best move to ensure the franchise didn't stagnate and die out, as what was obviously happening to it in the eyes of anyone with more than two brain cells. You are a drooling mongoloid if you think the series could've survived just by doing the same thing over and over "but muh different character hurrhurr."

Fuck off back to your desolate shithole.

>I didn't know you spoke for everyone
The game sold and it was very well received.
You're saying that it was the wrong direction for the franchise because you didn't like it; that just means that it's not the a game for you.

user the series is heading to Loki, his own son, causing Ragnarok and starting the same cycle of violence his father did. There's even a mural at the end foretelling this. Saying "oh Loki bad" isn't exactly accurate.
Quit samefagging, faggot. You don't speak for the entire GoW fanbase, and quit trying to strawman. What, did you work on the damn game and are getting defensive or something? I actually gave the new one some slack, but apparently that's not enough for you. So you can fuck off with your hurt feelings regarding my criticisms.
I didn't deny it sold well. You know what it also did? Brought in a new audience that never played the past games. To say that EVERY GoW fan was okay with the shift in gameplay is just asinine

that's why i used quotation marks. Also, kratos arrival disturbed the arrival of ragnarok and made it star 50-200 years earlier or something like that.

Ah okay. I wouldn't say "early" because the game already establishes time is wonky thanks to Yggdrasil. Jormangadr himself was flung back in time

>Quit samefagging, faggot.
There are at least four or five people disagreeing with you. You are genuinely mentally unstable.

Defending the older games so hard will not cause Kratos to manifest and fuck your ass raw, you humongous faggot.

Isn’t she his half sister? They both have Zeus as their father...

So?