What went wrong?

What went wrong?

Attached: The_simpsons-1-.jpg (360x360, 39.49K)

Nothing.

Too little, too late.

It... didn't really matter all that much.
It was as good as it could have been, but so what? This wasn't released alongside the 90s Simpsons that took viewers by storm, this was released alongside a stagnant and decaying Zombie Simpsons.

It truly could have been something special ten years before it came out, I could even live with it being the "finale" movie a mere five years prior. But no, they'll just never stop The Simpsons. And it's a shame too, because the movie could've been a satisfying finale.

They tried too hard to pander to a general audience who knew nothing of The Simpsons.

The movie is good but it wouldve been incredible if they made it for the fans instead.

I knew nothing about the Simpson and i liked it. The "rest rest rest" bit is quite hilarious

Bart's penis wasn't displayed prominently enough

Disappointing result considering it was Season 1-8 writers working on it.

Since the simpson's movie showed Bart's penis then what should the Family Guy movie show? Lois getting fucked on screen?
They already showed enough gore in the show already.

This
I wonder what might have been if the movie was released during like season 7 or something

Marge should have kept the implants

Based

Attached: 764013.jpg (1920x800, 246.46K)

>Lisa's "serious look out action pose" while getting chased by an angry mob.
>the copy pasted helicopters in the background.
there is something beautiful about these soulless, sterile promotion pictures. zombie simpsons has a lot of them. just the most recognizable things about the product mashed together in one picture, with little relating to the actual characters or without any internal logic.

Who the hell knows nothing of thw Simpsons, Early Zoomers?

Attached: 1583865991743.jpg (1133x446, 201.17K)

Attached: kwik-e-mart-cups-bart_Lisa.jpg (860x600, 174.36K)

Attached: 1571108657435.jpg (1553x800, 334.56K)

Attached: Simpsons movie Bart toy Burger King.jpg (500x447, 54.23K)

It was little more than just a really long Simpsons episode

Which is really all it could have been.

The pressure of having to justify itself as a movie. Everything had to be bigger, louder, faster, more jokes, more action. The end result was still somewhat entertaining, but bombast is not why I liked the Simpsons.

For my money, the best big screen translation of a cartoon series to date is still a tie between Beavis and Butthead Do America and South Park Bigger Longer and Uncut. The Simpsons Movie might not even be top 5.

Attached: Bart.webm (960x720, 2.11M)

in the first few minutes when greenday showed up to voice themselves and hum the theme song and I knew this was going to be corporate dreck.

>What went wrong?
Needed more naked Bart.

Everytime I see this image

Attached: peart.png (315x270, 70.14K)

The EPA didn't march into Springfield like an SS Einastzgruppen detachment and liquidate the entire population and burn the city to the ground.

Attached: German officers murder Russian villagers.jpg (1000x798, 214.87K)

Mike Scully

Here's the back view of that toy.

Attached: Naked Bart toy.jpg (1350x900, 145.33K)

Both correct.

Here's a bigger version of Bart's poster.

Attached: a9b9783cc1974b05e7061b46f29624ce.jpg (1000x1571, 245.85K)

It was just a longer episode, nothing more.
You might be wondering "Isn't that exactly what one would expect?"
Well, no. Look at the southpark movie. Not only was it a musical, and a REALLY good one at that, but it also involved the end of the world, a glorious return of Satan, Cartman being a superhero somewhat, all the extra cursing, an actually engaging storyline and the big reveal of Kennys face.
What did the Simpsons offer? A bunch of jokes and Barts penis.

>it's another "I want to fuck bart!" thread
Anyone who's horny over a Simpsons character has no hope. I'd pray for you if I thought any gods could help.

>and Barts penis.
It was clearly the main selling point of the movie,too.

Attached: Simpsons comic.png (578x526, 497.58K)

Shooped version with Lisa when?

Attached: simpstrip.png (986x1505, 841.96K)

Attached: Disney Plus Simpsons.png (2133x1200, 1.11M)

Nah they mostly tried to meme the Spider Pig song really hard
Why a low effort parody of 60's Spiderman's theme became such a huge part of the marketing beats me

Ahem

Attached: 1583796034408.jpg (475x396, 54.26K)

Attached: 1583796097824.png (500x552, 591.65K)

Attached: 1583802991284.png (1305x1606, 2.04M)

>all this marketing focused on showing a naked child
(((They))) were being really brash, weren't they?

Yes.

>What did the Simpsons offer?
I mean, it did have that whole "Springfield is doomed" plot...

This.

yet another 20 minutes of bart ass without a single lisa cheek

the writers owe us a half hour of lisa cunny at this point

People who spend their lives watching soap operas, shopping and reading gossip magazines.

Like, theres normies. Then theres NORMIES.

This links in to .

South Park worked because they wrote it as if die hard South Park fans were going to see it.

The Simpsons Movie was written for everyone.

>Early Zoomers
Not those anons, but for me, yeah. Born too late to catch the show in its prime and highest point of popularity. I knew it existed, just didn't see it for the longest time
Plus I only really watched CN and Nick as a kid and it didn't air on Adult Swim like FOXs other animated shows like Futurama, Family Guy or King of the Hill. The DVD of the Movie was the first actual exposure of the show that I got, liked it so I checked out some of the older episodes online and picked up some of the comics too

Attached: Bootleg_e91fd6_6487583.jpg (1200x1204, 258.99K)

Based and true.

Why is this board so obsessed with Bart's ass?

Why are the writers so obsessed with it?

Nobody was in character. It was just some generic movie with Simpsons characters swapped in.

Lisa was in character as in being boring and mostly useless.

Butts are funny

Lisa's doesn't even make sense with the tagline. Were they that unwilling to have her in a negative light?

This displays a surprising double standard for lisa va the rest of the Simpsons, when did she became the creators pet?

Pretty early on, the show always liked to have her and marge be the voice of reason. Of course the big trap is when "voice of reason" becomes "mouthpiece of the writer's political opinions".

>existing past the principle and the pauper

Not enough Lisa butt, too much Bart ass.

Doesn't mean you have to be

lisa is only useful for rule34

Not enough Sneed (Formerly Chucks)

I dunno, like season 3 or something?

He thicc

Pedofags

That lame Lisa's Boyfriend plot.

>altered propaganda photos.

Yes user, the nazis did nothing wrong. It's not like everyone hates them and there isn't a museum full of evidence of their crim-Oh wait! Yes there is!