Both of them depict same when girls are young(kindergarten~11years old)
But when they grow up to over 12 years old, european comics start to depict them with some mature ways(some grown chest or body volume)
Meanwhile American comics 12 years old girls are just as flat as same age boys.
Is it a taboo to 'sexualize' the teenager girls in American comics?
Or it's just a biological difference between europes and americsnd?
Why is the depiction of teenager girls different in American and European cartoons?
Other urls found in this thread:
America has some of the biggest fear of sex in the world. They are weird old prudes.
Indeed. Our country is pretty antiquated in many ways. Sucks to suck, especially with how this election is likely to turn out.
Definitely not a biological difference since if anything girls in America are starting puberty a lot younger these days compared to like a century or even decades before.
I'd say it's probably just a combo of creators these days being familiar with the internet and Rule 34 and not wanting to make things too easy for artists (yeah porn will get drawn either way, but maybe there'll be less blatant perving over a character if they're canonically more or less flat) + just wanting an obvious way to show that the character still isn't an adult yet. Some comics or shows that do the flat chest thing for teens still have adult women with figures, so it's like an easy way of differentiating age ranges. Not exactly a taboo but a self-imposed thing on the creators' parts.
No, it’s always been this way. American media infantilizes under 18s to act like pre-teens because there are too many crazy religious conservatives who would complain if kids in media acted the way real kids post-puberty act. And now there’s crazy liberals who feel exactly the same.
I'm not saying it's a completely new thing, but that I think in cartoons/comics nowadays it happens more compared to like the '80s or '90s, maybe even early 2000s.
Pedophilia is the worst taboo in America, and you're considered sub-human if you sexualize children in any way, including cartoons. Americans flip out at other countries and cultures that don't follow their "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!" mentality so ingrained in them, like Japan.
/thread
Same goes with swearing. Yet somehow they're very lax with violence.
Yes, however, let's be real for a second: french media is straight up pedo shit.
It's not like it's completely unexpected for it to be seen as extremely taboo.
But I agree that pedophilia should be seen as the mental illness that it is and not immediately demonized(for non-offending individuals), as all that does is prevent pedophiles from seeking help and could potentially lead them to doing harmful shit.
>pedophilia should be seen as the mental illness that it is and not immediately demonized(for non-offending individuals), as all that does is prevent pedophiles from seeking help and could potentially lead them to doing harmful shit.
this is exactly how i feel, yet i can't say that without coming off as a pedo
Yet the US is one of the largest exporters of porn.
Yes it’s a taboo. You can thank Comics Code for lot of things in American comic industry.
Being attracted to people who have reached puberty is neither a mental illness nor pedophilia though. The literal function of puberty’s visual indicators is to make people sexually attractive to normal, straight members of the opposite sex and show they’re now capable of breeding. If anything is a mental illness it’s people stubbornly believing against nature itself that no-one should be found sexually attractive until they turn 18.
What kind of comics are you cheerypicking?
We don't want to sexualize minors too.
We're for milfs
Most sexually conservative countries consume a huge amount of porn. Japan’s a classic example: restrictive traditional gender roles, ton of weird porn
dibs on the glass girl
you are grossly oversimplifying the social situation of every country and arguing correlation over causation
Insane progressives are now paranoid about catering to the 'male gaze' so they remove any sexual features from women on the off chance that men might be attracted to them. If you look at older American cartoons from the '80s and early '90s, breasts and even cleavage were commonplace.
American society in general has a serious case of maddona-whore complex.
Examples from older cartoons (Jasmine was 16 in the movie, this is from the cartoon series but she shouldn't be much older and looks the same physically).
I definitely think the left looks better than right, somethings a little fucked around the shoulders on the left but other than that it looks good.
Aptil wasn't a teenager but this is an example of how cartoons were less prudish in the past. You will never see someone with this physique or cleavage in a modern American cartoon.
>trap-ra looks better than she-ra
Haha, no. Just admit you're a faggot.
Let's not pretend this is new. Burgers think pre-teens going topless to the swimming pool is pedophilia.
Yeah, you're veering away from OP's point into one that's been discussed to death. We all know Americans are no longer allowed to create sexy women in kids' media, but OP's point was that there aren't really any realistic teenage girls.
my biggest problem with modern designs is how teens in the 15-18 age range are still drawn half the size of the adults around them despite the fact a fair majority of people will have reached their adult size at that age, and worse are often taller than their parents.
>Yeah, you're veering away from OP's point into one that's been discussed to death. We all know Americans are no longer allowed to create sexy women in kids' media, but OP's point was that there aren't really any realistic teenage girls.
They're really the same problem. They don't show sexually developed bodies on teen girls for the same reason they don't show them on adult women.
I think it's just to ensure that dumb kids knew who are the parents and who are the offspring.
I'm not saying I want to go and fuck the cartoon, the style just looks better. Seriously, the woman on the right looks like a coked out whore.
>eye shadow and lipstick make you a coked out whore
lmao go back to watching your son's soccer games, mommy
Why you getting so bent out of shape because a random stranger disagrees with you bruh?
They never have showed realistically developed teenage girls, they either look like pre-pubescent children or adult women. As much damage as it's caused, in this particular case woke shit really isn't to blame. It's an older issue with infantilising under 18s and not wanting to admit they can be sexually developed and therefore sexual beings themselves. Because that would make everyone a "pedo" as defined by American standards.
The slut sister archetype was really common in the 80-90's though. usually shown hanging on the phone all day with her friend and talking about boys and stuff.
trap-ra looks bad but let's not pretend the other looks like anything other than a whore in cosplay
>le I agree BUT I don't fallacy
go suck your guru's dick back in your sect, fanatic.
It’s funny because usually our fat little gmo swigging girls get their tits and start bleeding all over the world pace 1-2 years earlier than Euros.
They start in 7th/8th grade here.
t. euro
Is this another "boy France sure is great because they like to sexualize everything" thread? Is that all they're known for? Being a poor man's Japan?
>restrictive traditional gender roles
dilate
When will this meme die. The US is a liberal shithole.
>Drawing teenage girls with realistic figures is sexualising them
This is a prime example of what I was talking about here . Americans, both liberal and conservative, have a problem with accepting teenage sexuality and anything that hints at it brings out the pedo hysteria.
>I know nothing about non-anglo cultures
"THINK OF THE CHILDREN" has become an excuse for everything in the US. Internet commerce is only possible because of encryption, yet AG Barr (and some senators) are demanding a "back door" which only the Government can use.
Of course, that's impossible. Any technical expert will attest to that.
It used to be "if we can't crack everyone's files, the terrorists win" and now it's "if we can't crack everyone's files, the pedophiles win."
I fucking live here you Yas Forumstard.
cherry picking
Well its impressive that you've managed to become an american without living their.
Congratulations on getting colonised by the burgers.
*there
Fuck
>Aptil wasn't a teenager but this is an example of how cartoons were less prudish in the past.
It's not a matter of being prudish or not, it's just a matter of what animators want to do. You are just observing a change of trend.
Tangled is quite sexy in its own right.
Always relevant.
Animators have no say on the content of a cartoon, at all. Not even the board driven system will allow any creativity that isn't greenlit fist by the channel board and the investors.
When you found your country on liberalism, this is the result.
>Animators have no say on the content of a cartoon
Not really.
At least anti-terrorism is a cooler reason
>Is it a taboo to 'sexualize' the teenager girls in American comics?
yes
The assumption is that by not sexualizing young girls, some how young men will miss it and not pressure young girls for sex. Or it will help prevent the normalization of young girls as sexy and older men will ignore them.
Which is all nonsense because men of all ages instinctively look for developed women. They will find big tits on a 11 year old hot or not, regardless of what is in media.
By not having it in media, it just makes the first few girls in class that get tits, buts, periods, etc feel weird and alien and at odds with their own body.
Are you guys using liberal in the burger context or in the proper context?
I'm confused as to what flavour of tard I'm dealing with.
Uncle Grandpa has quite the amount of sexy ladies, so not really.
There's also drawing teenagers like they were 8-year-olds.
Or maybe you're focusing too much on what people think about a subject you shouldn't be obsessing over.
>breasts and even cleavage were commonplace.
It's still around if you look the right places
>No, it’s always been this way. American media infantilizes under 18s to act like pre-teens because there are too many crazy religious conservatives who would complain if kids in media acted the way real kids post-puberty act. And now there’s crazy liberals who feel exactly the same.
the cosmic joke of this is that the most conservative about this are people that were giant sluts in their youth. Probably fucking as early as 12 to 14.
American liberals are only slightly less prudish than the Amish and yet somehow louder.
She's hot in mature lady way but not in sexy teen way
Fuckin frogs
Even with their best efforts, they couldn't make NuShe-Ra as ugly as old school She-Ra
I’m talking about liberal enlightenment values that the founders espoused. Liberalism was common thought up until the late 19th century.
Well that’s the thread topic user, if you don’t want to discuss it maybe go elsewhere?
Where is that come from? google gave nothing.
And it used to be that artists were the ones struggling against censorship and forced values (e.g. Mark Evanier), now they are the ones pushing for it.
three caballeros