I miss this show

People talk about Animaniacs being so great, but despite the flaws of Tiny Toons it still impresses me much more.

Tiny Toons definitely had lower lows (and plenty of them), but it also had way higher highs. It helped that you could actually care about the characters to some extent, something that Animaniacs was sorely lacking.

OH ME SO BUNNY

>those faces

Attached: fifi.gif (224x331, 2.75M)

Attached: 1451780273756.gif (500x375, 983.13K)

No I miss Buster

Fifi could easily out-horny Lum, though.

Attached: CB18e.jpg (3200x2100, 2.15M)

I never grew up with Animaniacs or Tiny Toons but I always loved the Looney Toons shorts. When I tried both of the former shows out I just thought Animaniacs was ok, and Tiny Toons was a little worse but still ok, about the same level as SATAM in quality honestly. At least most of the characters made for good porn I guess, but outside of nostalgia I don't get the obsession over these shows. Like, they're just aight, nothing much else. Would rather watch something from the 30s-50s.

Attached: 1554518145.png (1205x1280, 1.37M)

>gogo turns into an eyeball and rolls away
Too good for this world

>No you don't. You miss the time period in which this show came out, you miss having no responsibilities and being able to just sit around play video games and watch cartoon without feeling unbearable guilt. The show is shit, get your life together you fagafagooz

if this were true, by extension NES games and Star Trek TNG would also be shit, not to mention most Yas Forums things

grow up and let people like a world that was 30 years less shitty than this one.

Attached: angry-ozzie.gif (220x234, 5.07K)

Classic cartoons from the 20s-50s still hold up though, and they're way older than Animaniacs and Tiny Toons. Good things are good no matter their age; these shows were alright and you're not wrong for liking them, but they have many glaring flaws that the love for them feels more nostalgia-fueled than anything.

I'm not the user you're responding to, but I don't really get the argument (like, in general) that if a show's not a perfect 10/10 masterpiece you can't love it or that your thoughts on it must necessarily be from nostalgia or whatever. I mean, it's one thing if the show is commonly seen as shit, but since you even say these shows are at least not bad, what's the problem?

Also just to clear this up: I'm not some crazy Tiny Toons fan or something; I've just seen this view about a lot of different things and it strikes me as weird

Animaniacs was a variety show. You're not supposed to "care" about the characters any more than you would the Muppets in the context of their original show.

there's a bit of a sliding scale. Cartoons from the 20s to 50s are good because, for the most part, they didn't try to cheap out.

then, cartoons became "mass-produced" for television, the Hanna-Barbera/Filmation model of limited animation on a low budget, relying on dialogue and recycling cels and footage to pad things out.. only starting to spend money again when they were selling action figures. but all this stuff was competing with 1940s Looney Tunes reruns showing all the kids what animation could be.

Tiny Toons must have looked like a fucking renaissance, WB returning to form. well, it wasn't quite 1940s WB, but it wasn't He-Man either.
>let Orko talk, we don't even have to lip-sync him.

nor was it the pop culture circle jerk that Animaniacs became... but the whole Kids WB lineup from that period had this voice to it... hard to explain. but it's like every show in its 1995 lineup was meant for a different kind of misfit kid.

Well most of the drama is because the people who grew up with these shows do act like they're perfect flawless masterpieces. Like personally I wouldn't mind seeing either show rebooted or possibly done better, or even having the characters reappear in other shows, but if you love a show than you would admit that it isn't perfect neither.
Loving something is loving it in spite of its flaws, which you acknowledge. If you act as if it's the greatest thing ever and go out of your way to ignore its flaws, that's an obsession, not love.

Okay, I guess we might be talking about two different things then. I sorta read your post as "how can you love X when Y is better," which is the argument that I've seen a lot and that I don't get, but if that's not what you were actually saying then I guess we're essentially on the same page.

Attached: anon if a fag.png (1024x439, 235.96K)

animaniacs was better in every single faucet, stop this charade

Honestly you came up as the kind of guy that doesn't consider Freakazoid funny.

No show is perfect but humor just like those few highs some show reach don't disappear with time, if anything one might argue age does them favors, just look at classic animation, very few people alive can replicate it with modern tools as the industry has little room to innovate outside of optimizing better 3d tools.

>but outside of nostalgia I don't get the obsession over these shows. Like
Both Babs and Fifi are those characters that awaken something in you even if that's obvious it's a good reason why it's remembered. Outside those 2 I can't really remember any character that isn't just Kid version of their mentor except maybe Elmyra but we don't talk about her, so if it wasn't for those two it's just remembering their best episodes or someone just really liked kids versions of cartoons

>animaniacs was better in every single faucet
Animaniacs was half the time Hollywood inside jokes no kids would get, repetitive scenarios and jokes (Katie Ka-boom, Chicken Boo, Pinky and the Brain, any Warner skit which is usually Warners meet someone, annoy them, repeat until end of skit) or just boring (Hip Hippos).

Money is not necessarily an indicator of quality. The content of many, many earlier cartoons doesn't hold up and leaves them only of interest from a historical perspective, while some cartoons of the cheap TV era (e.g. Rocky and Bullwinkle or UPA) shine because of their writing. They started pumping money again for the action figure era, but the writing was still crap. The late '80s/early '90s boom paired good (or at least usually passable) animation with solid writing.

>Hollywood inside jokes no kids would get
I fail to see how this is a negative.

Want to know how I know you're a retard?

I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed this upon rewatching the show decades later.

"We're annoying" is basically the Warners' singular joke.

The show is still around. You can still watch the show. It's available, it didn't go anywhere. You can't miss what's not gone. The only reason you're not watching it right now is because it's really really bad.

I want new episodes ya spoon

Attached: images (4).jpg (225x225, 9.54K)

Attached: john k animaniacs.png (510x549, 239.85K)

Attached: john k animaniacs (2).png (511x519, 173.21K)

>John K

Attached: guyde eye.png (217x225, 118.84K)

wtf of all places, lum and a looney tunes character

Shame they didn't make more episodes featuring this little guy.

Go Go Dodo was the best character on Tiny Toons.

Attached: Gogo_Dodo_1.jpg (553x400, 32.42K)

>you miss having no responsibilities and being able to just sit around play video games and watch cartoon without feeling unbearable guilt.

The flaw in your logic is assuming that anyone on this website would ever feel any amount of guilt over being a NEET.

he's right

The 90's "faux-rubberband" style was infinitely more pleasing on the eye than whatever Jon K. tried to do with Ren & Stimpy and his later works

Knowledge is being able to identify individual design elements based on the era they hail from. Wisdom is being able to combine them aesthetically.

there should be a continuation where the gang grows up and they show us their mundane adult lives.

Attached: article-2331901-19D017FC000005DC-671_634x400.jpg (634x400, 31.55K)

It's sort of weird how all the other kids are based on recurring Loony Tunes characters, but Gogo is based on a one-off character.

I feel like the writers just wanted to have a section of Acme Acres that leaned even more heavily into wacky cartoon surrealism than the rest of it, and "Porky in Wackyland" gave them the precedent they needed.

It's been long enough. Just as the original cast were supposed to be successors to the original Looney Toons, Buster can be a professor at Acme university teaching the current crop of cartoon characters. I call it, "Tiny Toons: the Next Generation."

Also, anyone who says this show doesn't hold up hasn't seen this scene:

youtube.com/watch?v=HbepxXKCVRA

Someone in another thread suggested that The Loony Tunes Show should have been about the Tiny Toons cast in their adulthood.

It's an amusing idea. The Tiny Toons grow up to become bored suburbanites who get into sitcom-style hijinks that are notably different than the classic cartoonery they learned in school.

Following this? If so it wouldn't be so mundane for some.

Attached: 1536653776135.jpg (1200x768, 233.78K)

they looked way younger than 13/14 years olds

OH LOOK ITS THIS OSWALD SHILL AGAIN. oswald died 50+ years ago. he will never see the light of say again. time to face facts fucko

>13 year old shirley
man I would totally ravage that duck ass

Let's go Way Forward then.

Attached: b49e998c1ea91fdbdc740981e9c437e2.png (2000x2300, 1.44M)

>Mom's tits shoot out the moment she grabs Babs's tail
What was the intention here?

Attached: Screenshot_20200308-052051_YouTube.jpg (2220x1080, 470.61K)

What are they doing?

Diction

I liked Harriet

>use the movie as a chance to increase the romantic tension
How fucking based can you get?

Attached: Screenshot_20200308-065606_YouTube.jpg (2220x1080, 445.19K)

I would totally fuck babs up the ass

Ed Benedict liked Animaniacs you know :^)

Which studio was the one that just let her hang out

Attached: Screenshot_20200308-070359_YouTube.jpg (2220x1080, 630.5K)

>baby Looney Tunes
they're 13-14 bro

Wang

Das ironic

Attached: SmartSelect_20181031-093738_YouTube.jpg (831x963, 234.52K)