I normally avoid anything with tweets...

>waaah why should women have rights

Have sex incel

Attached: 0ad7057063da038295c980e84a26ae5d.jpg (700x700, 65.55K)

Incels don't exist.
If you were from Europe, you would know that.

Keep up the good work. God speed.

Agreed.

Obvious bait is obvious. Ignored.

most companies having diversity departments didn't give it away?

Because putting rights above others is not the fucking time in a pandemic.
If they want to preach equality they shouldn't have a Saudi Arabian royal as their head of human rights.

He didn't deflect, he answered you rather well.

There's a guest list I wouldn't want to be on.

Unfortunately not for some.

I wonder how many non white nations of The UN have diversity officers and programs?
I am going to guess none.

They just have to say shit like this to stop couped up retarded normies from bashing their nagging women to death during this lockdown

Why do institutions, businesses and politicians insist on throwing around buzzword salads that make no fucking sense?

What rights do women lack? And what do those rights have to do with a pandemic?

Women's rights lack what they fail to imagine.

Same user here, just switched to pc from phone.

>Burden of proof falls on the one who is implementing things; no organization promotes anything unless it is intended to be effective.

I don't know if your purposely posing this as some new revelation that people don't understand? Yes, organizations will push for there message if they think the push is effective. I don't see the problem here

> it’s forcing more libertarian values into a worldwide pandemic for no other reason than to push those values.

So the problem with your answer is that I have to ask now, what is the problem with pushing for more libertarian values using the world wide pandemic? There have been many devastating events in which political parties push their values as the "fix." Example: 9/11 turned America more Conservative, and undoubtly people were campaigning for Conservative values.

>It’s obviously propaganda. Now with that said, can you explain exactly the benefit of being more inclusive for “minorities” and how that changes the given situation? Obviously the UN thinks it needs to happen, but I’m failing to see any logical reasons aside from *propaganda*. This is a Trojan Horse of neolib policies under the disguise of “aiding a pandemic” with no reason. What, in your words, is the benefit?

So you still have to explain why this propaganda is bad. I don't know where your question about minorities comes from, the tweet has nothing to do with minorities, last I checked women make up half the population, so that question seems like a pivot. Again, calling this a trojan horse isn't helpful for your argument because pushing for certain types of values by political parties during a crisis is something that has happend for all of time, refer yourself to my example above. Also, I don't know what the benefit is, but I don't really care, it's still up to you to explain your position on the matter.

Attached: in_brain_cells.jpg (2492x2767, 1.17M)

SAY IT WITH ME
PROPAGANDA!
Always look behind the curtains. Keep promoting self-awareness!

I don't think it's active propaganda, and it's not even wrong. I mean I surely wouldn't oppose gender equality and women's rights (for white people). Not to say they're essential for getting through this, but clearly it's just your regular bullshit tweet to distract people.

They enjoy word vomit results after tossing a word salad.

Also forgot to mention this, giving me a wall of names without telling me why it's important is not an effective way of arguing. Care to explain why this list of names you have ready to copy and paste from a text document on your computer is important to your point?

But it's not even good propaganda because it doesn't convey a message or an idea, it makes no sense.
I can't even disagree with it because it's such an empty nonsensical statement.
It would be like saying White Supremacy is the leading factor in Coronavirus related deaths

>I don't know where your question about minorities comes from.

What races are minorities? As you are speaking for the UN. I am sure you know white people are 7.2%.
What level are we classed as minority?
Even better, how about preach that shit in nations where they do not have rights we have spilled blood for to grant them.
We owe the world nothing, in fact we owe them our hatred. We gave them everything, even our own homes and beds...we are hated for it.
Fuck you and the blue horse you rode in on.
Go and preach equal rights in other nations, nations that don't have them.
Faggot.
Fuck you.

Your entire post was one huge deflection. No, I did not make this thread to voice my own political platform, because I am nonpartisan.
I will continue to discuss with you after you answer the question I have already asked: what exactly is the purpose of these policies and how are they going to help?
Answer this and I will address the rest of your post. I’m not getting into a long argument built solely on fallacies.

If you knew the names, you would know.
Read outside of the course books dude.
Ffs, think for yourself...that's literally all we want here, it's the whole fucking point of Yas Forums.
Think for yourself.

Correct, but that is because you are thinking logically. For the irrational, this reads as good news despite its emptiness.

feminists will always move the goal posts and even outright lie because belief in a lack of "gender equality" is their golden ticket to force social change for as long as they want.

Attached: 1876861818.jpg (800x510, 113.12K)

You missed this part of his post:

>So you still have to explain why this propaganda is bad.

The word propaganda is in it.
That's why it's bad.
He believes their is "Good UN propaganda".
Carry on boys, nothing to see here...

>in case anyone on this board thinks there is no such thing as active propaganda
Imagine being this new

Attached: 1563583777811.gif (400x206, 1.35M)

the active measures are the people that are dying from Covid in the hospitals. Stay in, don't work, scuttle your business, just take the check.

>Same user here, just switched to pc from phone.
>there message
>libertarian values
>9/11 turned America more Conservative

Attached: quality bait.jpg (319x320, 51.12K)

They just come off as being high on their own farts.
Sometimes I wish I were a retarded empty drone, the world would seem much nicer I think, cheering on every stupid statement that comes out any official body like they are pearls of wisdom, drinking some good old government ejaculate, spending money I don't have for a quick dopamine rush.
Man the stupidity is increasing exponentially.

Take the cheque and plan.
War of attrition.

It’s fucking awful how many people aren’t aware of this nonsense given the age we live in, but I guess that’s also due to entropy in information theory. Still, all I can do is play my part and make threads like this. If it brings one person to a level of beginning to ask questions, then I consider it successful. Take *nothing* at face value, always do your research, and hold every authority figure to high standards and intense (but fair) criticism.

>So you still have to explain why this propaganda is bad.
Let me try:

Most of this board is of the opinion that western women have equal opportunity, or even enjoy systematic privileges over western men. All the while being continuously messaged about weird upside down reality from mass media - which is what makes the UN message inflammatory.
So it boils down to whom the message is for: Most lower class men in the west would find it offensive, as it's difficult to see how "women's rights" would improve their situation, given majority of women around em seem better off.

If the message is intended for countries that do practice systematic oppression of women, however, that would be tad bit different.

Propaganda is always good if it's effective because it shapes a narrative regardless of the idea expressed.
This is not even propaganda, it's like they had an intern string random LiveJournal popular buzzwords together and added the coronavirus reference for temporal context.

What's going on with you lads? The firemen were fighting cops a couple of months ago.
And paramedics too.
Did you get a list of cops so you don't have to go out to them?
If I was a paramedic and my mates or firemen were attacked by supposed allies, I would have made a fucking list of retribution.
Enjoy your coof officer...remember when you kicked me in the head?
"Have a warm bath, that will help...too busy to talk, sorry mate!"

If it were for those people, it wouldn't be in English mate.
It would be in Arabic or Pidgen.
Message the UN and ask for their Arabic version of the message and wait for the response.
Tell them you want to put it up in Mecca.
Write the email in Aramaic from a VPN, see what the response is.

>3/4 of the patients in ICU are men
>this virus is bad for women
big brain take

I don't plan on catching any disease and I disdain all government workers be they doctors, teachers, nurses or cops.
They can kill each others for all I care.

No one cares what the UN says

I know the benefits of propaganda from my/our perspective, but I wish I didn't have to use it.
To have the "UN" (literal NWO) spout it at me just makes me fucking angry.
Both our nations wrote the fucking laws of equality, half a millenia or more before UN existed, we don't need their images to remind us.
God I hate the UN.
If they ever make a move btw, kill as quick as you can and take their uniforms.
I dont know how much longer we can have these online Minecraft forums!

It's probably the safest approach.
But it would cheer me up to hear that several officers died from coof after they used metal bars on paramedics heads before.

Faith in brits: restored.
Keep up the good work. Don’t take no shit from these fucking globohomos.

Won't happen. Ever.
A Britain/France pair up on street level against UN is not off the cards from the current game tbqh.
The Greeks have them on their land atm, they were the ones running off and breaking locals car windows.
I would have put bear traps out for them.

We had one cop die of the virus so far as far as I know

Are you austisic? The tweet is about women, not WHITE women. I know you've probably never had a real life conversation before, so try to follow the conversation.

>Your entire post was one huge deflection.

Incorrect. Also, I'm not making an argument for the purpose of the U.N. policies, I was asking you to explain your postion and the conversation led to the foundational questions I asked which are: Why is it wrong to push for a political parties values during a time of crisis, and why is propaganda bad?

>I will continue to discuss with you after you answer the question I have already asked: what exactly is the purpose of these policies and how are they going to help?
Answer this and I will address the rest of your post. I’m not getting into a long argument built solely on fallacies.

Once again, refer to my answer above to you calling my post a deflection. Also, it's funny how you'll only conversate with me only if I'm going to be talking about why the UN policies are good, seems cowardly considering you can't answer my basic questions that are relevant to our original conversation.

>men are overwhelmingly represented in chink flu cases and deaths
>BUT THE WOMEN

What in the living fuck does "Gender Equality" and "Women's rights" have to do with a global pandemic? Those are both social issues that have no relation to recovering from a disease outbreak.
Good post.
Nice bait.
You have more brain cells than the person who wrote this propaganda for the UN.

They aren't all bad.
Some mean well.
But I would love to be a paramedic called out to a number on a list.

yes I am autistic. I can't help it.
I thought you wanted equality?
If you did, why are you trying to "shame" me for something I cannot help?
And of course I assumed that, it was wrote in English and sent from UN twitter of England.
So instead of being a parody of yourself, why is the Chief of Human Rights for The UN a Saudi Royal?

I also switched to my PC as the captchas were getting annoying.
Okay, fine, my issue with this can essentially be summed up by:
&
Those two post cover my political views fairly well; I am against forced diversity, homosexuality, and useless policies. Not only do I fail to see what rights women, gays, or anyone else in the west lack, but I also fail to see anything even remotely helpful about this statement from the UN.
>Why is it wrong to push for a political parties values during a time of crisis?
So it seems to me that, with the amount of political chaos and subversion happening in the west, it is strangely out of place to promote these groups in particular as if giving them more rights (what are they lacking?) or inclusivity (to what? where? purpose?) in a time where no matter who you are, you are able to contract the virus. I have already explained that this is more political in nature than it is in a humanitarian nature, and it's obvious that the very groups that the UN are aiming toward in their statement tend to be leftist regardless of the country. I am attacking it because it has absolutely no place in current events, this is not the time to be discussing "muh rights". That is the most you are going to get from me regarding my political views; I refuse to let you derail my thread.
Now, since you have stated you are not in support of the UN's statement, what the fuck are you prodding for? What is *your* purpose in this thread? What are you hoping to achieve?

>and why is propaganda bad?
Are you serious?

No response?
I guess you don't believe in what you are selling, only we weren't buying from the start.

You have a problem with the fact we went to war for 500 years to grant people equality.
Fair enough.
It shows your cognitive capability.
I lack social cues, you lack intellect.
I'm more liked.
You believe in a system you do not understand yourself, I pity you for it.
I don't even dislike you for it, as long as you are happy. And obviously you are, because you are confident enough to win us over in debate.
Good for you, and I mean that.
It takes balls (I didnt mean to assume your genitals).

So why is the Chief Officer of Human Rights for The UN a Saudi Royal (whom btw has observed over beheadings, you can see him on bestgore).

You're replying to the wrong guy mate. I'm on your side here. You wanna talk to the faggot who is defending the UN.

Oh shit, sorry mate.
I got lost in my red haze.