>savages are savages because... they're savages lol
These movies are fucking shit.
>savages are savages because... they're savages lol
These movies are fucking shit.
ok tranny
How else would you describe a nigger?
> getting filtered by LOTR
Don't reproduce.
it's called evolution, my friend. we are different from them and there is science to back it up. my ancestors lived in houses and theirs lived in the jungle. savages are savages because they are genetically conditioned to act like savages. :)
But...that's literally the case. Europeans in Africa (and anywhere) = civilisation, nuclear power, etc.
Africans outside of Africa (and handed civilisation on a plate) = destruction of previously rich and civilised places like Haiti, Baltimore, Chicago, London, Paris etc.
I mean it's not like when Europeans sailed to the Americas or Africa they would find people as educated as they are.
In certain respects, the nobility among Amerindians were better educated and substantially more intelligent than their Hispanic conquerers. They quickly grew to surpass their conquerers knowledge of Latin and their legal system, which is why Spain soon after made it illegal for them to learn how to read and write.
Amerindians are technically asian after all, they certainly have more potential than those moorish rape babies.
based redditorc
Just like celts, viking and mongols
savages because....well, just because they are savages, no reasons needed
>no reasons needed
Muh "good vs evil" is poor storytelling.
If orcs were civilian migrants simply seeking a peaceful life within society, bigotry and abuse against them would indeed be wrong.
>my ancestors lived in houses and theirs lived in the jungle
Ah yes, houses, well-known to be a natural environment exclusive to Europe.
You don't know shit about evolution. There haven't been any significant changes to the human genome since long before the first house was ever built.
Huts made of sticks and bison shit don't count as houses, faggot.
>NOOOO, HIGH FANTASY STORIES AREN'T ALLOWED TO HAVE SIMPLE PLOTS, IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE MORALLY AMBIGUOUS
Yes. Having an entire race of creatures just be "evil" is fucking retarded.
thats where you're wrong kiddo
This, demons have to be good too
>If the focus on the movie isn't appealing to my noble savage maymay fetish then it's shit and shallow despite the depth it goes into for other things.
>be a race created for war
>get mad because they're so uncivilized and savaged
they were savages because Sauron's tax policy was terrible
The films and the source material (which you haven't read because you are an imbecilic baitfag) pretty clearly state that the nature of the Orcs is due to the dark magic used to mutate/create/perpetuate them.
So your point is moot and your b8 is weak as fuck.
vikings raided out of absolute necessity because of their population pressure and no good farmable land. Celts were the same way. Mongols though? fuck the mongols, they could've settled wherever they wanted but they didn't.
The very nature of life, sapient or not, is that even among a race created for war there would be individual beings who would be unwilling to fight the creator's war, be they "defects" or otherwise.
They were literally created out of Elves by Melkor to be evil twisted abominations you doofus
I dunno, they say all white are evil so I dunno why now say an evil race is unrealistic.
imagine being too stupid for lord of the rings
didn't even know it was possible until now
>we've gotten to a point where fantasy is so pozzed that people are lashing out against the idea of orcs being evil
What's next, good demons?
Yeah they existed, some orcs didin't care about Sauron and fought their own wars
>all dragons are innately greedy and selfish with a lust for gold
Why the antisemitism?